Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roger v. Estate of Moulton, 513 So. 2d 1126.

175 citing documents.

Rashall v. Pennington 982 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Clinton L. Johnson v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Johnson v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 980 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Gray v. American Nat. Property & Cas. Co. 977 So. 2d 839 La. 2008
Id., 950 So.2d at 547 ().
Fescharek v. US Agencies Ins. Co. 979 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Halphen v. Borja 961 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co. 950 So. 2d 544 La. 2007
1 Cir. 2/11/05), , the court of appeal stated, "The expression of a desire not to have UM coverage, however clear, does not necessarily constitute a valid rejection if the expression does not meet the formal requirements of law."
Chesser v. Royal & Sunalliance Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Richardson v. Lott 928 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Lee v. Naquin 924 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
the Supreme Court stated: In Louisiana, UM coverage is provided for by statute and embodies a strong public policy.
Dupuy v. Allstate Ins. Co. 920 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Plaintiff asserts that the cases allowing parol evidence are not good law and should be rejected by this court, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that a valid rejection of UM coverage must be expressly set forth in a single document as of a specific date and in a particular policy issued, and that a writing of a less precise nature, regardless of the insured's intent, is insufficient to effect a valid rejec
Pierce v. Foster Wheeler Constructors, Inc. 906 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
[1] Hebert v. Cournoyer Oldsmobile-Cadillac GMC, Inc., -881 (La.1982)(interpreting prior LSA-C.C.
Cohn v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 895 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Deep South Towing, Inc. v. Sedgwick of New Orleans 887 So. 2d 458 La. 2004
Millet v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance 887 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Knight v. Owens 869 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Reno v. Travelers Home and Marine Ins. Co. 867 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Midence v. Williams 860 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Smith v. TERREBONNE PARISH CONSOL. GOV'T. 858 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Burns v. Hetler 842 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Nall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 833 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Mosing v. Domas 830 So. 2d 967 La. 2002
Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc., 95-1925 (La.12/8/95)
Guidry v. Millers Cas. Ins. Co. 822 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Jones v. Jones 817 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Duhon v. Baquet 815 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
for the proposition that the rejection of uninsured motorist coverage must identify a particular policy of insurance in order to be valid.
Butler v. Allen 808 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Franklin v. Coleman 793 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Smith v. Doe 786 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Stewart v. Edwards 784 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Dardar v. York 808 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1 Cir 9/24/99), , writ denied, 99-3089 (1/7/2000)
Husband v. Darby 772 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Thigpen v. RPM Pizza, Inc. 772 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Clavier v. Roberts 755 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Melton v. Miley 754 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Magnon v. Collins 739 So. 2d 191 La. 1999
Carrier v. Reliance Insurance 742 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Sutherland v. Babin 735 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Taylor v. Rowell 736 So. 2d 812 La. 1999
Smith v. Foret 734 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Becnel v. Stein 726 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Herman v. Rome, 95-666 (La.App.
Taylor v. Rowell 727 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Ballam v. Seibels Bruce Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Adams v. Dupree, 94-2353 (La.App.
Odom v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Daigle , p. 3; 691 So.2d at 1214
Maney v. Bennett 703 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Gowen 699 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
See also Roger v. *1172 Estate of Moulton, Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins.
Bullock v. Homestead Ins. Co. 697 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Daigle v. Authement 691 So. 2d 1213 La. 1997
Eubanks v. Hoffman 685 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Hollenbeck v. Oceaneering Intern., Inc. 685 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
art. 2133; -1136 (La.1987) (on rehearing); (La.App.
Moyles v. Cruz 682 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996