Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lewis, 539 So. 2d 1199.

80 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Dewayne Fitzgerald Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
However, under current standards, voluntariness is determined by the totality of the circumstances, with the ultimate focus on whether “the statement was the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice or the result of an overborne will.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. William G Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
This “voluntariness” determination is based on the totality of the circumstances under which the statement was given, (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Jeremy Andre Sinceno La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
This “voluntariness” determination is based on the totality of the circumstances under which the statement was given, (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Byrielle Hebert La. 2021
However, under current standards, voluntariness is determined by the totality of the circumstances, with the ultimate focus on whether “the statement was the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice or the result of an overborne will.” (La.
La. 2020
However, under current standards, voluntariness is determined by the totality of the circumstances , with the ultimate focus on whether “the statement was the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice or the result of an overborne will.” State v. Lewis , (La.
La. 2020
2680, 2689, 97 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987); State v. Lewis , – 05 (La.1989) (commercial contract law only a point of departure in construing a plea bargain agreement) .
State of Louisiana v. Ray Donald Brister, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), State v. Lewis (La.App.
State of Louisiana Versus Dermaine Norman La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Alexander 267 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Lavalais , 685 So.2d at 1053 ; State v. Lewis , , 1205 (La.1989).
State v. Westley 263 So. 3d 888 La. 2019
11/30/94), , 1148-49 ; State v. Lewis , , 1204-05 (La.
State v. Collins 263 So. 3d 878 La. 2019
11/30/94), , 1148-49; , 1204-05 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
State v. Foster 224 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/30/94), -49 ; -05 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Karey, Jr., A/K/A Woodrow Karey, II La. 2017
11/30/94), -49; -05 (La.
State v. Allah 216 So. 3d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Karey, Jr. AKA Woodrow Karey, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Karey 180 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
State v. Girtley 172 So. 3d 1098 La. 2015
STATE IN the INTEREST OF K.L.A 172 So. 3d 601 La. 2015
State v. Chisolm 139 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Divers, 38,524 (La.App.2d Cir.11/23/04)
State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), (La.App.
State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), ; (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Martin P. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Lavalais, 95-0320, p. 6 (La.11/25/96), (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Aaron W. Ardoin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Ardoin 58 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Birgans 57 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
in which the supreme court stated it relied on contract principles to reach a reasoning that a plea bargain is a contract between the state and one accused of a crime.
State v. Shelton 26 So. 3d 745 La. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Lavalais, 685 So.2d at 1053
State ex rel. D.S. 23 So. 3d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Monroe, 99-1483, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Marshall 6 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
85 , 139 L.Ed.2d 42 (1997); (La.App.
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
State v. Lavalais, 685 So.2d at 1053
State v. Boyte 973 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Roberts 973 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State v. Honeycutt 953 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
to explain that contract principles apply to plea bargains.
State of Louisiana v. Fay v. Perez, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Perez 939 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Lewis 930 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Steven R. Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Crockett 886 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
cited by both the Defendant and the State in their briefs, the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the law regarding statements made during plea discussions: The rules serve to promote negotiated disposition of criminal cases by giving the defendant protection from involuntary self-incrimination at two ends o
State v. Adams 884 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), ( ).
State of Louisiana v. Corey Marquee Adams, Whitney Batiste, and Horatio Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), ( State 3 v. Lewis, ).
State v. Ganser 852 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Terrebonne 822 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
to explain that contract principles apply to plea bargains.
State v. Roberts 822 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
' appears the following: We relied on contract principles to reach a decision in Nall, reasoning that a plea bargain is a contract between the state and one accused of a crime.
State v. Canada 838 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
appears the following: We relied on contract principles to reach a decision in Nall, reasoning that a plea bargain is a contract between the state and one accused of a crime.
State v. Robinson 807 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by