Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 588 So. 2d 757.

223 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jimmie Dixon, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone A. Stewart La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
“The standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Garrett J. Ward La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jamol Rickmon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
When reviewing a challenge to the evidence supporting a conviction, appellate courts are required to review the trial record as a whole and determine whether, after looking at all the evidence in a light favorable to the prosecution, “a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Darren Bridges La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 12/3/97), (La.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of D.J.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Damond Scott La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Harrison J. Bethley La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Sharonda S. Freeman La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Manuel Dukes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.P. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Warner 274 So. 3d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 5/16/16), , 1166 (quoting State v. Green , , 758 (La.
State v. Baugh 262 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Green , (La.App.
State v. Carter 257 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; , 758 (La.App.
State ex rel. W.S. 250 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Green , (La.
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Green , (La.
State v. Contreras 247 So. 3d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 12/3/97), , 228 ; State v. Green , , 758 (La.
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Green , , 758 (La.
State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
State v. Green , , 758 (La.
State v. Harrison 239 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Green , , 758 (La.
State v. Cretian 238 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Green , , 758 (La.App.
State v. Green 220 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. De Gruy 215 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. George 204 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 ; (La.
State v. Wells 203 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“If rational triers of fact could disagree as to the interpretation of the evidence, the rational trier’s view of all of the evidence most favorable to the prosecution must be adopted.” (La.App.
State v. Jackson 193 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Appellate courts “must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Miner , 14-0939 at p. 5, 163 So.3d at 135-36 ; (La.App.
State v. Hickman 194 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“If rational triers of fact could disagree as to the interpretation of the evidence, the rational trier’?s view of all of the evidence most favorable to the prosecution must be adopted.” (La.App.
State v. Dove 194 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Lambert 191 So. 3d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (LaApp.
State v. Jones 182 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Powell 179 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); 2 (La.App.
State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. White 174 So. 3d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Miner 163 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Handy 156 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); 8 (La.App.
State v. Canales 156 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Ramirez 154 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Cameron 152 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781, 2792 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 ; (La.App.
State v. Jasper 149 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Watkins 146 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Gordon 146 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Hatfield 155 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
State v. Haynes 144 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (LaApp.