Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

Barton v. Hines 884 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Simms v. Progressive Ins. Co. 883 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Koehn v. Rhodes 882 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Jarrell v. Miller 882 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
James v. Robinson 880 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
It should not be overlooked that the trial court did, in fact, award general damages which, if considered too low
James v. Robinson 880 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
NOTES [1] It should not be overlooked that the trial court did, in fact, award general damages which, if considered too low, (La.
Lyons v. Progressive Insurance Co. 881 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Andrews v. Dufour 882 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Sandres J. Guidry v. Dwight Manuel, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., cert denied, 510 U.S. 1114, 114 S.Ct.
Guidry v. Dwight Manuel, Inc. 877 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1990); ce rt denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
Guillot v. Doe 879 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Phillip Bruce Jackson v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Melvin G. Guillot, Indiv. Etc v. John Doe, Indiv. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
During surgery, he was given surgical anesthesia, which involved the use of intravenous sedation as well 1 cert.
Jackson v. Safeway Insurance Co. of Louisiana 879 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Cooper v. LOUISIANA STATE DOTD 885 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
certiorari denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
Cole v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 886 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
(citing Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., *466 ), the court instructed that, "Only after such a determination of an abuse of discretion is a resort to prior awards appropriate and then for the purpose of determining the highest or lowest point which is reasonably within that disc
Martin v. Performance Motorwerks, Inc. 879 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Musacchia v. Hilton New Orleans Corp. 876 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Scarbrough v. OK Guard Dogs 879 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
(citing Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ), the court instructed that, "Only after such a determination of an abuse of discretion is a resort to prior awards appropriate and then for the purpose of determining the highest or lowest point which is reasonably within that discretio
Glen J. Moody v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The standard of this court’s and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Moody v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 872 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Hornsby v. Bayou Jack Logging 872 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Barry Hornsby and Larry Hornsby v. Bayou Jack Logging La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Craft v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 874 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
McCarter v. Sanchez 874 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Petranick v. White Consolidated Industries 870 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
the court reiterated the long standing rule that general damages are not susceptible to exact calculation and that the trier of fact has much discretion in fixing awards.
Thibodeaux v. STONEBRIDGE, LLC 873 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Miller, 03-0091 at p. 7, 857 So.2d at 463
Mitter v. Touro Infirmary 874 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
the Supreme Court stated: [T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Riley v. Salley 874 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
McCormick v. Allstate Insurance Co. 870 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Howard McCormick, Indiv. v. Allstate Ins. Co. and Amy Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 878 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
*644 (citing Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ), the court instructed that, "Only after such a determination of an abuse of discretion is a resort to prior awards appropriate and then for the purpose of determining the highest or lowest point which is reasonably within that discretio
Hose v. Younger Bros., Inc. 878 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Celia Ann Marks v. Ohmeda, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Benjamin ex rel. Benjamin v. Housing Authority 871 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Marks v. Ohmeda, Inc. 871 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Vera R. Paine v. Avoyelles Council on Aging La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Paine v. Avoyelles Council on Aging 869 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Craige v. Broome 869 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
DAMAGES In Harvey v. Cole, supra at 13 808 So.2d at 781 , this Court stated: our Supreme Court set forth the standard of review of general damage awards as follows: The standard for appellate review of general damage awards is difficult to express and is necessarily non-specific, and the requirement of an articulated basis for disturbing such awards gives little guidance as to
Elizabeth Monk v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Appellate review of a in which the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [T]he role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.
Monk v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 866 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Appellate review of a in which the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [T]he role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.
Engles v. City of New Orleans 872 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Franz v. First Bank System, Inc. 868 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Young v. Fitzpatrick 865 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Dana Desselle v. Michael Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The standard for an appellate court’s and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Keith A. Lowery, Et Ux. v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
the supreme court articulated the standard of appellate review of general damage awards: [T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Cornelia E. Young v. Kevin Fitzpatrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
As such, “the role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.”
Lowery v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 865 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
the supreme court articulated the standard of appellate review of general damage awards: [ T]he discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Desselle v. LaFleur 865 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
Turner v. Lyons 867 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004