DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Winters 118 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Dorthey, [ , (La.1993) ] at 1281 (Marcus, J., concurring); State v. Young, [94-1636 (La.App.
  • State v. Holloway 120 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    -1326 (La.1982); Picot , 98-2194, p. 1, 724 So.2d at 238 ; see also, (providing that Louisiana’s Habitual Offender statute is simply an enhancement of punishment provision; it does not punish status and does not on its face impose cruel and unusual punishment).
  • State v. Crossley 117 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Smith 117 So. 3d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Fisher 117 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Singleton 117 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Allen 117 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Jerald C. Fowler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Fowler 114 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. George 117 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Stephens 114 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Church 114 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Smith 114 So. 3d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. George 115 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Martin 115 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Smith 116 So. 3d 884 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    to cruel, excessive or unusual punishment.” the supreme court recognized that, in certain circumstances, a minimum mandated sentence could be constitutionally excessive.
  • State v. Watson 135 So. 3d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Reyes 114 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Woods 115 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Johnson 115 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Hamm 114 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Humphreys 114 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Bailey 115 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Simcoe Cole AKA Simco W. Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3/4/98), -77, the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed downward departures as follows: In State v. Dorthey, supra, [] this Court held that a trial court must reduce a defendant‟s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law “makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment”, or is nothing more
  • State v. Cole 156 So. 3d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-9 (La.3/4/98), -77 , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed downward departures as follows: In State v. Dorthey, supra, [ ] this Court held that a trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law “makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment”, or is nothing more than “the purposeful impositi
  • State of Louisiana v. Johnny L. Eubanks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” [ ( ] ).
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HAROLD OZENE A/K/A JAMIE OZENE A/K/A HAROLD J. BOOTE A/K/A HAROLD J. OZENE A/K/A … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    This case also does not meet the requirements of the rare instance where a departure from the mandatory sentence may be warranted due to an unconstitutionally excessive sentence in violation of the Eight Amendment of the United States Constitution (Louisiana Constitution Article 1, § 20)
  • State v. Brown 115 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Eubanks 112 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” [ (]).
  • State v. Cleveland 115 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Seaton 112 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Fletcher 112 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Gage 113 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Hogan 113 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Ernest Joseph Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Arceneaux 111 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Parker 112 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In State v. Dorthey, [ ], this Court held that a trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law “makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment”, or is nothing more than “the purposeful imposit
  • State v. Goosby 111 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Willis J. Mouton AKA Willis James Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Mouton 129 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Hamilton 110 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 *261 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Carey 110 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hunter 110 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Smith 110 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Thomas 110 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Lewis 110 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 *655 (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
  • State of Louisiana v. Wayne Kevin Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Johnson, [97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ], 675
  • State v. Jones 107 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Johnson, [97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ], 675
  • State v. Duncan 109 So. 3d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013