DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Robinson 108 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    and State v. Johnson, 1997-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context.
  • State v. Womack 109 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Davis 108 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Blackson 108 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Wynne 108 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Shaw 108 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Payne 108 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Frank Allen Fregia, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Emmanuel Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Fregia 105 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Barnes 103 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Harris 105 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Terry 108 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Howard 106 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Robinson 106 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
  • State v. Lewis 107 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Dee 103 So. 3d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Dietrich Jamal Thibodeaux AKA Dietrich Thibodeaux AKA Dietrich J. Thibodeaux Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law “makes no measurable contribution t
  • State v. Thibodeaux 100 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    ptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that t
  • State v. Glover 106 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Courtney Paul Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Savoy 103 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Smith 105 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.08/04/98)
  • State v. Williams 101 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Green 106 So. 3d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. White 106 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Small 106 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Pope 106 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Martinez 135 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Palmer 105 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Williams 103 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Tatum 103 So. 3d 550 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. *557 Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Jones 103 So. 3d 498 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Johnson 103 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Barrett 104 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Guess 104 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Odom 104 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Price 103 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Bonanno, 384 *
  • State v. Hough 103 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Hardman 103 So. 3d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Henry 103 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Jones 103 So. 3d 420 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Johnson, 1997-1906 (La.03/04/98), ; State v. Gay, supra.
  • State v. Celestine 92 So. 3d 335 La. 2012
    On the other hand, a majority on the court of appeal panel, taking into account that defendant admitted committing the offense but that he was otherwise an “exemplary citizen,” who suffered from “bouts of deep depression,” and further considering the standard established by this Court’s decisions in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), for determining when a trial court may depart from the mandatory minimum sentence specified by the legislature for an offense, concluded that defendant “has cle
  • State v. Tyler 93 So. 3d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Fikes 93 So. 3d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Washington 93 So. 3d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Brown 93 So. 3d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Anderson 93 So. 3d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Jackson 92 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    [State v.] Dorthey, supra [ ] at 1281 [(La.1993)] (Marcus, J., concurring); State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App.