Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

State v. McFarland 92 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Brown 92 So. 3d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Lawrence 91 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1 We remanded the case for the trial court to rule upon an outstanding motion for reconsideration of sentence and |2to conduct an evidentiary hearing wherein Mr. Lawrence would be permitted to present any evidence to support his claim that a
State of Louisiana v. Alfonzo Jewade Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-81 (La.1993) (footnote omitted), the supreme court noted in the context of a habitual offender proceedings: “If, in this case when defendant is ultimately sentenced, the trial judge were to find that the punishment mandated by R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cooper 134 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Leger 92 So. 3d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Authier 92 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Paul 90 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Even a sentence within the statutory limit may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment, Id.; and, accordingly, imposition of |na sentence, even those within the statutory limit, may be reviewed on appeal.
State v. Foster 92 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Blanche 91 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Underdonk 92 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Jackson 87 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Walls 86 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Holder 87 So. 3d 241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Poupart 88 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Fontenot 87 So. 3d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The only qualification to this limitation of review of a sentence for excessiveness, even if the sentence falls within the statutory limit, is found in Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 which guarantees that |m“[n]o law shall subject any person to euthanasia, to torture, or to cruel, excessive, or unusual punishment.”
State v. Horne 88 So. 3d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
First, he urges for a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentence
State v. Sam 88 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. John D. Skinner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
“ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” [ ( ]).
State v. Skinner 84 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“ ‘[T]he exeessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” [ ( ]).
State v. Washington 86 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Murray 86 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Denson 83 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Mastin 86 So. 3d 39 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Thomas 90 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Cornejo-Garcia 90 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Funes 88 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Buckley 88 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mosley 80 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Barton 80 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Diaz 81 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Dixon 81 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Robinson 79 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Frith 109 So. 3d 907 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Gill 80 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Elmore 80 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Williams 81 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
did not purport to grant a district court the power to usurp that legislative prerogative or to impose what the court believes is the most appropriate sentence for a particular offender in a particular case.
State v. Proctor 80 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State of Louisiana v. Joseph A. Granger, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Joseph A. Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Joey Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Joey Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Joey" Alford Granger " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Joseph A. Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Jones 80 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Gardner 77 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011