DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Caldwell 78 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Cunningham 77 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Shipp 78 So. 3d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Lara 78 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Garner 78 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Anderson 78 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Pouncy 78 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Neal Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    me, we cannot agree with the court of appeal majority that the sentence imposed by the trial court, although the maximum penalty for the offense, “makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
  • State v. DEVILLE 74 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    rounding commission of the crime, we cannot agree with the court of appeal majority that the sentence imposed by the trial court, although the maximum penalty for the offense, “makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
  • State v. Dowell 75 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The trial court in Perkins, when granting the March 2, 2007 motion for reconsideration, simply found the original 2002
  • State v. Young 73 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Caldwell 74 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Esque 73 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Moton 73 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Thompson 72 So. 3d 978 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Boyd 72 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Washington 73 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Washington 73 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Wade 77 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State ex rel. Augillard 67 So. 3d 1256 La. 2011
  • State v. Johnson 70 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Wallace 71 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Landfair 70 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    15:529.1 without any inquiry as to whether the sentence was excessive under the facts of the case and the defendant’s history of drug offenses
  • State v. White 68 So. 3d 508 La. 2011
    uated fifth offender received only one-half of the original term of imprisonment imposed on defendant scarcely supported its conclusion that defendant’s sentence, in effect, made “no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and [was] nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.”
  • State v. Watson 71 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Smith 71 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Richardson 71 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Shoupe 71 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Ingram 71 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Enterkin 71 So. 3d 475 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Travis Bourda La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Johnson, supra, at 675
  • State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. BOURDA 70 So. 3d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Johnson, supra, at 675
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Ellis 67 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Barnett 70 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Lister 69 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Lewis 69 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Mudd 69 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Carol Wayne Crooks, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarman Gerard Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    In State v. Dorthey, [] we held that this power extends to the minimum sentences mandated by the Habitual Offender Law and that the trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law “ma
  • State v. Jones 63 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In State v. Dorthey, [ ] we held that this power extends to the minimum sentences mandated by the Habitual Offender Law and that the trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law “makes no measurable contri
  • State v. Howard 64 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Hill 64 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Brisco, 04-3039 (La.7/6/06)
  • State v. Hall 64 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Williamson 62 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Boswell 62 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Kimble 62 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Hanks 58 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)