Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

State v. Wood 11 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Campbell 15 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Prine 13 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/08)
State v. Cheatham 12 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Howard 13 So. 3d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Hanson 12 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; 6
State v. Ealy 12 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Brown 12 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Coffman 13 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; *728
State v. Hill 12 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Cheatham 12 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Strattman 13 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
First, defendant argues his 15-year mandatory minimum multiple offender sentence is excessive and that he is entitled to a
State v. Thomas 13 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Defendant also cites State v. *600 Dorthey, and argues that the trial court erred in failing to recognize its authority to interfere with the sentencing scheme set out by the legislature if it determined the sentence was excessive.
State v. Anderson 6 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Tomlinson 8 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Thornton 8 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Thomas 7 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Hicks 7 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Vidrine 5 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
"' [T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State of Louisiana v. Raymundo Franco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State of Louisiana v. Patrick Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State of Louisiana v. Felicia Ann Luno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State of Louisiana v. Casey Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State v. Franco 8 So. 3d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law renewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Thomas 7 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. LUNO 5 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
"' [T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. Tellis 5 So. 3d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
State v. Reed 4 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Lewis 4 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Brunet 5 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. James M. Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Baker 3 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. RT 999 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
"` [T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. Alexander 2 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Jamerson 1 So. 3d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Speed 2 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Jackson 1 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Johnson 2 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Holland 2 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Morrison 999 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; (La.
State v. Babineaux 8 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
|3On April 10, 2008, (La.
State v. Brewer 2 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Based on the foregoing, we find that the State is correct in its argument and that the sentence that the court should have imposed was a mandatory life sentence, barring any finding that a
State of Louisiana v. Charles M. Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Warren 2 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Whitfield 998 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. AUGUILLARD 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. Maricle 998 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State of Louisiana v. Bert D. Whitfield, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().