Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. R.L.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
State of Louisiana v. J.B. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Slocum 26 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Cox 26 So. 3d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Linnear 26 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Noble 26 So. 3d 924 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Egan 26 So. 3d 938 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Haynes 26 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Linnear 26 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Washington 26 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State of Louisiana v. Wayne Patterson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Patterson 22 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. Nelson 25 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Webster 26 So. 3d 208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; *210
State v. Richie 25 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Marshall 26 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Falcon 26 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Bernard 26 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Wilson 26 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
P. art. 61; State v. Brisco, 2004-3039 (La.7/6/06), ; State v. Montgomery, 42,432 (La.App.
State v. Martorana 27 So. 3d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Wise 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Brister 24 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Roy J. Chapman, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Broadus Darneal Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
g or mitigating factors which would justify the imposition of a sixteen year sentence.” He further argues that the trial court is “authorized to particularize the sentence imposed to the offender and the offense and to disregard the punishment range required by the habitual offender statute in order to insure that constitutional, non-excessive sentences are imposed,” (La.
State v. Davis 19 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
vating or mitigating factors which would justify the imposition of a sixteen year sentence.” He further argues that the trial court is “authorized to particularize the sentence imposed to the offender and the offense and to disregard the punishment range required by the habitual offender statute in order to insure that constitutional, non-excessive sentences are imposed,” and State v. Pollard, 93-660 (La.10/20/94), .
State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Redfearn 22 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Ashley 22 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 *1057 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Burton 22 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Robinson 22 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Robinson 22 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Stale v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Dorthey, *1071
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Clark 16 So. 3d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. SARRETT 17 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; State v. *1058 Bonanno, State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.2d Cir.05/12/04), ; State v. Robinson, 40,983 (La.App.2d Cir.01/24/07), .
State v. Woods 16 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
and State v. Johnson, 1997-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
State v. Briggs 19 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
On October 1, 2008, he filed a motion to declare the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law — that he anticipated would be applied to him —
State v. Standfill 15 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Mead 16 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
3 See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
State v. Triggs 16 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Yates 15 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
State v. Harrison 16 So. 3d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. DSJ 15 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. D. S. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“A punishment is constitutionally excessive if it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.”
State v. Montelbano 15 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
See State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; State v. Weaver, 01-0467 (La.01/15/02)
State v. Hotard 17 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Shaw 15 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Freeman 13 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. D.S.J. 15 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“A punishment is constitutionally excessive if it makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.”
State of Louisiana v. Connor L. Wood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009