DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Demetrius D. Zeno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Glaston F. Maricle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” (quoting 3 ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Russell J. Auguillard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Zeno 997 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Wattigny 996 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Capers 998 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Johnson 999 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Rogers 999 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Smith 999 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; |n(La.1993).
  • State v. Sudds 998 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Smith 999 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. HAZZIEZ 999 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS WAHHAD HAZZIEZ AKA JOHNNY JOHNSON La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Brown 997 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State of Louisiana v. Bobby D. Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2861, 2866, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Lewis 1 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Tassin 998 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In support of this argument, State v. *284 Johnson, and State v. Wooten, 136 La.
  • State v. TURKS 997 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Wagner, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” [(]).
  • State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In support of this argument, and State v. Wooten, 136 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jimmy James Mack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Wagner 996 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” [ ).
  • State v. S.L.D. 997 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    61, “the district attorney has entire charge and control of every criminal prosecution instituted or pending in his district, and determines whom, when, and how he shall prosecute.” Further, the district attorney “has great discretionary power to file a habitual offender bill[.]” State v. Brisco, 04-3039, p. 13 (La.7/6/06), *770 , citing State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.1993), .
  • State v. SLD 997 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Further, the district attorney "has great discretionary power to file a habitual offender bill[.]" State v. Brisco, 04-3039, p. 13 (La.7/6/06), *770 , citing State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.1993), .
  • State v. Brooks 997 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Brooks 997 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Roberts 996 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    -81 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court specifically held that when a trial court determines that the minimum sentence mandated by LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Glover 997 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Lawson 997 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Webber 997 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Durham 996 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Brown 996 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Carroll 996 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Penn 996 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Carroll 996 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Penn 996 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Littleton 996 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Franklin 996 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Darnell 988 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Ates 989 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Doyle 989 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Colgin 989 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Mead 988 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Number 38, 129-KW, Opinion rendered September 18, 2003, directing this Court to impose sentence as required for a and the guidelines of State v. Johnson, 97-1906, , (La.03/04/98).
  • State v. Perkins 988 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Howard 987 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Lay 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Martin 985 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Robbins 986 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Presson 986 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Vinyard 986 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.