DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Fizer 986 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Derrick Baker, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Rowe 982 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Baker 986 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Johnson 982 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HECTOR LEYVA-MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR L. MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR LEYVA AKA HECTOR LAZARO LEYVA MARTINEZ La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Leyva-Martinez 981 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Collins 981 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/93), ; State v. Smith, supra .
  • State v. Tucker 981 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Cook 981 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Hollins 981 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Mason 981 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Morris 982 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Archie Louis Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Carter 981 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Batts 979 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Jarreau 982 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    a trial court could find that a mandatory sentence is unconstitutionally excessive as applied to a particular defendant.
  • State Ex Rel. Ab 983 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Brooks , 04-779 at p. 9, 889 So.2d at 1070
  • State ex rel. A.B. 983 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Brooks, 04-779 at p. 9, 889 So.2d at 1070
  • State v. Birch 979 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Cross 982 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Newton 978 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Harris 980 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/03), .
  • State v. Robbins 979 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Edwards, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.” ().
  • State v. Edwards 979 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Arabie 982 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Alexander 983 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    App. 5 Cir. 9/30/02), [ State v. Brooks, 01-864, pp. 14-15 (La.App.
  • State v. Wright 978 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Louis Hayes, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Scott 978 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jones 982 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. McKinney 976 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Gullette 975 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Guidroz 977 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Harris 974 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Parker 974 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Calhoun 974 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Dixon 974 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Johnson, 709 So.2d at 676 , State v. Young, 94-16:36 (La.App.
  • State v. Carter 974 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Davis 975 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Joshua 973 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Art. I, § 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum *972 sentence is excessive.
  • State v. Fields 973 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Gill 974 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. HEDGSPETH 974 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/4/03)
  • State v. Shorts 973 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith (II), 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Boyte 973 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Coker 973 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Cunningham 972 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Washington 972 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)