Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brooks, 661 So. 2d 1333.

94 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Don Lee Johnson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Ahkeem Jamal Wiggins, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
Alonzo Ford Versus Darell Vannoy, Warden La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
10/16/95), (in which the supreme court found that counsel’s choices of which questions to ask on cross-examination fall well within the ambit of trial strategy); and State v. Moore, 16-644 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Trinity D. Phillips La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Selma Thomas Mangham La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Charles Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jordan J. Oneal-Taylor La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Deangelo Whitaker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
Steven R. Tate Versus State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Jonathan Brown La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Tony D. James La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Master La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Victor J. Demery La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. John Shallerhorn La. 2023
10/16/95), (requiring assistance of reasonably competent counsel acting as a diligent, conscientious advocate for defendant’s life i n capital cases); La.
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Jermaine Green La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Clardis Edward Galloway, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
10/16/95), State v. Bayles, 53,696 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Trenton Bayles La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
10/16/95), State v. Turner, 52,510 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Simuel Shaw Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
1984); State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on reh’g); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.
State v. Turner 267 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
10/16/95), ; State v. Mansfield , 50,426 (La.
State v. Galle 267 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/16/95), , 1337 (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Dressner 255 So. 3d 537 La. 2018
10/16/95), ; State v. Sanders , 93-0001 (La.
State v. Reeves 254 So. 3d 665 La. 2018
State v. Broadway 252 So. 3d 878 La. 2018
10/16/95), , 1337, and, moreover, Broadway merely presents conclusory allegations.
State v. Williams 240 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/16/95), , 1337 (on rehearing); State v. Robinson , [19]98-1606, p. 10 (La.
State v. Chambers 212 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App, 4 Cir. 8/11/99), .
State ex rel. Kenny v. State 207 So. 3d 1053 La. 2016
State ex rel. W.B. 206 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
10/16/95), , 1337 on rehearing).
State v. Wilson 208 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Cosey 194 So. 3d 602 La. 2016
undertake "a reasonable investigation [which] would have uncovered mitigating evidence,” and that failing to put on the available mitigating evidence “was not a tactical decision but reflects a failure by counsel to advocate for his client’s cause,” which resulted in "actual prejudice.” State v. Hamilton, 92-2639, p. 6 (La.7/1/97), (citing State v. Brooks, 94-2438 (La.10/16/95), ; State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), ).
State v. Amos 192 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Jackson, 97-2220, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Mansfield 190 So. 3d 322 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963); State v. Brooks, 94-2438 (La.10/16/95), .
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Tyler 181 So. 3d 678 La. 2015
client’s cause;” (3) which caused “actual prejudice.” State v. Hamilton, 92-2639, p. 6 (La.7/1/97), (citing State v. Brooks, 94-2438 (La.10/16/95), and State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), ).
State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Paulson 177 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
e to investigate and present significant mitigating evidence constituted ineffective assistance); State v. Hamilton, 92-2639, pp. 5-10 (La.7/1/97), -34 (ineffective assistance during sentencing shown by counsel’s failure to make an opening statement, failure to present any mitigating evidence, and failure to plead for a life sentence); State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 9 (La.10/16/95), -39 (counsel’s failure to investigate and present easily obtainable mitigating evidence was not reasonable strategic
State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Lee 181 So. 3d 631 La. 2015
to undertake “a reasonable investigation [which] would have uncovered mitigating evidence;” and (2) failing to put on the available mitigating evidence “was not a tactical decision but reflects a failure by counsel to advocate for his client’s cause;” (3) which caused “actual prejudice.” State v. Hamilton, 92-2639, p. 6 (La.7/1/97), (citing State v. Brooks, 94-2438 (La.10/16/95), and State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), ).
State v. Jenkins 172 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 7 (La.10/16/95), .
State ex rel. Wearry v. Cain 161 So. 3d 620 La. 2015
ounsel failed to undertake “a reasonable investigation [which] would have uncovered mitigating evidence,” and that failing to put on the available mitigating evidence “was not a tactical decision but reflects a failure by counsel to advocate for his client’s cause,” which caused Weary “actual prejudice.” Hamilton , 92-2639 at 6, 699 So.2d at 32 (citing State v. Brooks, 94-2438 *623 (La.10/16/95), ; State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), ).
State ex rel. J.D. 154 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), , 1337 |s(on rehearing).
State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Watson 147 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(citing State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), ; and State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. 11Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Burke 103 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Jones 99 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
*1067 State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
entence vacated on ineffective assistance of counsel grounds, and eventually defendant received a sentence of life imprisonment); habeas granted, (defendant and his co-defendant, George Brooks, repeatedly raped an 11-year-old boy and shot him several times); , rev’d, 94-2438 (La.10/16/95), ; (during the course of an aggravated burglary, defendant cut the throats of his 6-year-old and 11-year-old victims, allowing them to drown in their own blood); State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), (defend
State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), (on rehearing); State v. Robinson, 98-1606, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
State v. Brooks, 94-2438, p. 7 (La.10/16/95), -1338 (on rehearing).
State v. Ford 57 So. 3d 297 La. 2011
State v. Hamilton, 92-2639, p. 6 (La.7/1/97), (citing State v. Brooks, 94-2438 (La.10/15/95), ; State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), ).