Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 673 So. 2d 585.

136 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Robert H. Miller, III A/K/A Robert Miller, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), Zatarain v. WDSU Television, 95-2600 (La.App.
Suzanne Farrell And Joseph Farrell v. Circle K La. 2023
Lashondra Jones v. Market Basket Stores, Inc. (Parish of Calcasieu) Appellate Court Decision Vacated; District Court Judgment Reinstated; … La. 2023
5/10/96), (holding that the danger of striking a fixed object while sledding was obvious and apparent); Shelton v. Aetna Cas ualty & Sur ety Co., (La.
Evelyn Burlison v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Univ., 95-1466, pp. 12-16 (La.5/10/96), -93.
William P. Dering v. Kay W. Dering La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
B. Guttry v. Costco Wholesale Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Dangelo Dugas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), Zatarain v. WDSU Television, 95-2600 (La.App.
Officer John Doe, Police Officer v. Deray Mckesson; Black Lives Matter; Black Lives Matter Network, Incorporated La. 2022
Deanna Smith v. State of Louisiana Through the Department of Transportation and Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Gerald P. Snyder, Gavin P. Snyder and Tommy A. Guidry, Jr., All as Proper Representatives of the Decedent, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Charles Carter La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, p. 7 (La.5/10/96)
Brittany Cavet v. Abc Insurance Company and Maison St. Charles, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Sabrina Robertson and Walter Robertson v. the Kearney Companies, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Jose Araujo Versus Gwendolyn Troxler and Larry Troxler, Jr and Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. DAVID BOURG La. 2019
De Rome A. Seals v. Franklin Avenue Baptist Church of New Orleans, La La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Primeaux v. Best W. Plus Houma Inn 274 So. 3d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Riley Leblanc v. City of Abbeville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
LeBlanc v. City of Abbeville 259 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Cangelosi v. Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C. 252 So. 3d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/10/96), , 591 (citations omitted).
State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Murphy v. Savannah 246 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Eskine v. City of Gretna 240 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/10/96), , 590 ; Watts v. Scottsdale Ins.
State ex rel. H.J. 238 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Boutall v. Christakis, P.M., Co. 236 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/10/96), , 591-93, cert denied , 519 U.S. 1007 , 117 S.Ct.
Chesney v. Entergy La., L.L.C. 245 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Williams v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. 217 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Stone v. Lakes of Chateau North, L.L.C. 208 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Robert D. MAYEUX and Lisa M. Mayeux v. George J. CHARLET, Jr., Deceased, Charlet Funeral Home, Inc., Rev. … 203 So. 3d 1030 La. 2016
5/10/96), (Lemmon, J., concurring; joined by Kimball, J.)(noting “[i]n the usual case where the duty owed depends upon the circumstances of the particular case, analysis of the defendant’s conduct should be done in terms of ‘no liability’ or ‘no breach of duty.’”).
Jones v. Stewart 203 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Chatman v. Southern University at New Orleans 197 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Tech Univ., 95-1466, p. 22 (La.5/10/96), (Lemmon, J., concurring).
Robin Rogers Richard, Et Ux. v. Town of Lake Arthur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), cert.
Sutherland v. Alma Plantation, L.L.C. 193 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
t has “no duty” should be reserved for the exceptional situation in which there is ‘“a rule of law of enough breadth and clarity to permit the trial judge in most cases raising the problem to dismiss the complaint or award summary judgment for defendant on the basis of the rule,’” Zimko , 03-0658, p. 23, 905 So.2d at 482-83 , quoting Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, p. 2 (La.5/10/96), , quoting Professor David |7W.
Bridgewater v. New Orleans Regional Transit Authority 190 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
(citing Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, p. 8 (La.5/10/96), -90 ).
Ducote v. Boleware 216 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In the usual case where the duty owed depends upon the circumstances of the particular case, analysis of the defendant’s conduct should be done in terms of “no liability” or "no breach of duty.” Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), (Lemmon, J., concurring) .Thus, resolution of a negligence case based on a finding that a defendant has "no duty” should be reserved for the exceptional situation in which there is "a rule of law of enough breadth and clarity to permit the trial j
Helwig v. H.P.B. Inc. 182 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Office of State Bldg., 12-1238 (La.04/05/13), ; Caserta v. Wal-Mart Stores., Inc., 12-0853 (La.06/22/12), (per curiam); Dauzat, 995 So.2d at 1186 (per curiam); Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 03-1533 (La.02/20/04), ; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech Univ., 95-1466 (La.05/10/96), .
Moore v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 186 So. 3d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Broussard, 113 So.3d at 184 ; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech Univ., 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), .
Bailey ex rel. Brown v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 184 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Id.; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech Univ., 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), , cert.
Jordan v. Thatcher Street, LLC 167 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Id.; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), , cert.
Hooper v. Brown 171 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In determining whether a condition is open and obvious to all the fact-finder should focus on “the obviousness and ap-parentness of the complained of condition” because “it is improbable that a potentially dangerous condition which is observable to all will cause injuries to an individual who exercises reasonable care.” Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, 95-1487, p. 12 (La.5/10/96), .
State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, p. 7 (La.5/10/96), .
State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See, Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, 95-1487, p. 8 (La.5/10/96), .
Dannie K. Davis, Et Ux. v. Burke's Outlet Stores, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Davis v. Burke's Outlet Stores, LLC 155 So. 3d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Tech Univ., 95-1466, 95-1487 (La.5/10/96), , cert.
Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLC 171 So. 3d 851 La. 2014
Office of State Buildings, 12-1238 (La.4/5/13), ; Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), -87 (per curiam); Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), ; Fiire v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), -93 .
Christiano v. Southern Scrap Recycling 131 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), .
Graupmann v. Nunamaker Family Ltd. Partnership 136 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Id.; see also Pitre v. Louisiana Tech Univ., 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), .
Currie v. Scottsdale Indemnity Co. 123 So. 3d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech Univ., 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), .
State ex rel. A.S. 156 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, p. 7 (La.5/10/96), .
Broussard v. State ex rel. Office of State Buildings 113 So. 3d 175 La. 2013
Univ., 95-1466, pp. 12-16 (La.5/10/96), -93 .