Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kalie, 699 So. 2d 879.

149 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Stephen Elliot La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher L. Jones La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana Versus Michael Wallace La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417, 101 S.Ct.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Ray Allen Parker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    9/ 19/ 97), ( per euriam); State v. Williams, 2009- 0074 ( La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Lauren Nicole Diaz La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
  • State Of Louisiana v. Myron T. Bland La. 2024
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity .” State v. Huntley, 97–0965, p. 2 –3 (La.3/13/98), citing State v. Kalie, 96–2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), and United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417, 101 S.Ct.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Jeremy Cooper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
    9/ 19/ 97) , ( per curiam) .
  • State of Louisiana Versus Jeremy Simmons La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State Of Louisiana v. Michael Boeh La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
    9/ 19/ 97), per curiam).
  • State Of Louisiana v. J Ay-quan Carter La. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Brandon Bell-Brayboy La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
    9/19/97), Manning II, supra; State v. Arnold, 34,194 (La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Joshua Jamar Coleman La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    9/ 19/ 97), ( per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. Zeke T. Kelpe La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. Kari Shisler & Joseph Dyczewski La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
    9/19/97), noted “that the determination of reasonable grounds for an investigatory stop, or probable cause for an arrest, .
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Dupart La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
    9/19/97), ), and calls for consideration of whether “the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure ...
  • State Of Louisiana v. Kalipp Lindsey La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    9/ 19/ 97), ( per curiam).
  • State v. Jackson 257 So. 3d 179 La. 2018
    9/19/97), , 881 (quoting United States v. Cortez , 449 U.S. 411 , 417, 101 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Malveaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97)
  • State v. Malveaux 245 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v. Kalie , 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), , 880.
  • State v. Ruff 237 So. 3d 490 La. 2018
    9/19/97), , 881 (quoting United States v. Cortez , 449 U.S. 411 , 417, 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Manning 244 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Miguel 211 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    9/19/97), ), and calls for consideration of whether “the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure ...
  • State v. Barnes 203 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    9/19/97), (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Freeman 194 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Franklin, 31,068 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/98), , writ denied, 98-2982 (La.3/19/99), 739, So.2d 781, citing Whren v. United States, supra, and State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • Patricia Parker v. Town of Woodworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    In making a brief investigatory stop, the police “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Kalie, 96–2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417–418, 101 S.Ct.
  • Parker v. Town of Woodworth 160 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In making a brief investigatory stop, the police “must have a partial-larized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gross 145 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), (per curiam).
  • State v. Gates 145 So. 3d 288 La. 2014
    1581, 1585 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989); State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Everett 156 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    o bicycle shall be used to carry more persons at one time than the number for which it is designed and equipped.” In so finding, the Court noted that “[t]his combination of circumstances (the defendant’s flight upon seeing the officers and the passenger on the handle bars) provided the officers with reasonable grounds to stop the defendant.” Id., citing State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (police need only “some minimal level of objective justification”).
  • State v. Hall 134 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1581 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989) (although the level of suspicion need not rise to the probable cause required for a lawful arrest, the police must articulate something more than an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch); State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (to make a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the Upolice must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity).
  • State v. McClendon 133 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Our review is “an objective inquiry into the totality of the circumstances surrounding the encounter,” State v. Dumas, 00-0862, p. 2 (La.5/4/01), (citing State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), ), and calls for consideration of whether “the facts available to the officer at the moment 19of the seizure ...
  • State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    This review is “an objective inquiry into the totality of the circumstances surrounding the encounter,” State v. Dumas, 00-0862, p. 2 (La.5/4/01), (citing State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), ), and calls for consideration of whether “the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure ...
  • State v. Duhe 130 So. 3d 880 La. 2013
    In making a brief investigatory stop the police still “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Reasonable suspicion is less than the probable cause needed to arrest a defendant; an officer “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Katie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • Distinguished State v. Guillot 115 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    It is well-settled “thát the determination of reasonable grounds for an investigatory stop, or probable cause for an arrest, does not rest on the officer’s subjective beliefs or attitudes but turns on a completely objective evaluation of all circumstances known to the officer at the time of his challenged action.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), , citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lampton 110 So. 3d 557 La. 2013
    In making a brief investigatory stop the police still “‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Magee 110 So. 3d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1581, 1585 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989); State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Foster 108 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Burney 92 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), ; State v. Lee, supra.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JAMES WILLIE WHITE AKA JAMES WILLIE WHITE, JR. AKA JAMES JUNE WHITE, ETC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    In making a brief investigatory stop, the police “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 5 411, 417-418, 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. White 87 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In making a brief investigatory stop, the police “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 6411 , 417-418, 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Pineda 90 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), (per curiam).
  • State v. Lee 79 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Roberson 81 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La 9/19/97), , citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Mulder 76 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    1581 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989) (although the level of suspicion need not rise to the probable cause required for a lawful arrest, the police must articulate something more than an inchoate and un-particularized suspicion or hunch); State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (to make a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police must have a ^particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity).
  • State v. Sinclair 72 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Whren v. United States, supra; State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.09/19/97), .
  • State v. Welch 59 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Handy 52 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    When there is no probable cause to arrest, to make an investigatory stop the officer “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Johnson 52 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), (per curiam).