Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.
-
State v. Wright
978 So. 2d 1062
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the circumstances in which a downward departure from the mandatory minimum habitual offender sentence is warranted, finding that it is rare and only warranted under exceptional circumstances.
-
State v. Jones
984 So. 2d 785
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Dixon
974 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the circumstances in which a downward departure from the mandatory minimum habitual offender sentence is warranted, finding that it is rare and only warranted under exceptional circumstances.
-
State v. Joshua
973 So. 2d 963
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Grant, 39,102 (La.
-
State v. Jones
975 So. 2d 73
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (quoting State v. Young, 94-1636, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
-
State v. Davis
975 So. 2d 60
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[16] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Smith
974 So. 2d 79
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Batiste, 06-0875 (La.App.
-
State v. Bell
972 So. 2d 1207
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Cunningham
972 So. 2d 1193
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Thomas, 41,734 (La.App.
-
State v. Beaner
974 So. 2d 667
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
1993), and State v. Johnson , XXXX-XXXX (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
-
State v. Shaw
969 So. 2d 1233
La. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Hall
969 So. 2d 827
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
- State v. Adams 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Robert Thomas Smith
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
e for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is “exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to o
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Colton
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
15:529.1: In State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-8 (La.3/4/98); -77 .
- State of Louisiana v. Raymond Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State v. Rogers
969 So. 2d 707
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Colton
968 So. 2d 1239
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
15:529.1: In State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-8 (La.3/4/98); , 674-77 .
-
State v. Smith
969 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant's sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law "makes no measurable c
-
State v. Zeigler
968 So. 2d 875
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
In State v. Johnson , XXXX-XXXX (La.3/4/98), -677 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the circumstances in which a downward departure from the mandatory minimum habitual offender sentence is warranted, finding that it is rare and only warranted under exceptional circumstances.
-
State v. King
969 So. 2d 1228
La. 2007
State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 18 (La.10/19/04), ; State v. Everett, 2000-2998, p. 7 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Galindo
968 So. 2d 1102
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Henry
966 So. 2d 692
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the circumstances in which a downward departure from the mandatory minimum habitual offender sentence is warranted, finding that it is rare and only warranted under exceptional circumstances.
-
State v. Dudley
984 So. 2d 11
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Supreme Court re-examined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory *30 minimum sentences in the Habitual-Offender Act.
-
State v. Brown
965 So. 2d 580
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
-
State v. Thomas
962 So. 2d 1119
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.
-
State v. Boudreaux
966 So. 2d 79
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Hollins
964 So. 2d 422
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Batiste, 06-0875 (La.App.
-
State v. Trackling
958 So. 2d 1209
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
-
State v. Dauzart
960 So. 2d 1079
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ().
-
State v. Hill
956 So. 2d 758
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
1993) and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
-
State v. Chisley
957 So. 2d 226
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Mims, 00-1507, p. 6 (La.App.
-
State v. Jones
954 So. 2d 296
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
-
State v. Taylor
956 So. 2d 25
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Robert
951 So. 2d 1057
La. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Thomas
954 So. 2d 777
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
*779 See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Landry, 2003-1671 (La.App.
-
State v. Allen
954 So. 2d 779
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Douglas
952 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Landry, 871 So.2d at 1239-1240 , citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Thomas
948 So. 2d 1151
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson , XXXX-XXXX (La.03/04/98), ; State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.App.2d Cir.10/23/02), , writ denied, 2002-2875 (La.04/04/03), .
-
State v. Thomas
951 So. 2d 372
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, *381 p. 6 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Simmons, 03-1458 (La.App.
-
State v. Hall
946 So. 2d 173
La. 2007
See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Batiste
947 So. 2d 810
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/96), ; State v. Landry, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
-
State v. Lemons
942 So. 2d 33
La. 2006
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant's sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law "makes no measurable c
-
State v. Allen
942 So. 2d 1244
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Anderson
945 So. 2d 768
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Mims, 00-1507, p. 6 (La.App.
-
State v. Craig
944 So. 2d 660
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
[3] In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences in the Habitual Offender Law.
-
State v. Young
943 So. 2d 1118
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), -77 ; -81 (La.1993).
-
State v. Chandler
939 So. 2d 574
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
In considering Chandler's assertions, and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , which address this issue of mandatory minimum sentence in the context of the habitual offender law.
-
State v. Smith
936 So. 2d 255
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.App.2d Cir.4/4/01), .
-
State v. Davis
935 So. 2d 763
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .