Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.

796 citing documents.

State v. JBB 25 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. R.L.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
State of Louisiana v. J.B. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Wilson 26 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Wade, supra; State v. Johnson, 1997-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
State v. Brister 24 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Batiste, 2006-0875 (La.App.
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Woods 16 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
and State v. Johnson, 1997-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
State v. Briggs 19 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
State v. Moss 17 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Batiste, 2006-0875 (La.App.
State v. Bell 16 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Batiste, 2006-0875 (La.App.
State v. Hayes 16 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.App.
State v. Mead 16 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
3 See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
State v. Harrison 16 So. 3d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Landry, 871 So.2d at 1239-1240 , citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , 676 Generally, a reviewing court must determine whether the trial judge adequately complied with the sentencing guidelines set forth in La.C.Cr.P.
State v. DSJ 15 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant's sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law "makes no measurable c
State of Louisiana v. D. S. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
e for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is “exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to o
State v. D.S.J. 15 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
ies provided by the legislature for an offense upon a showing by the defendant that he is “exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must redu
State of Louisiana v. Archie Louis Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3/4/98) State v. Taylor, 06-839 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Connor L. Wood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
e presumption, a defendant must show, by clear and convincing evidence, that, “because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (quoting from Judge Plotkin’s concurrence in State v. Young, 94-1636, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
State v. Carter 12 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Taylor, 06-839 (La.App.
State v. Wood 11 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
To rebut the presumption, a defendant must show, by clear and convincing evidence, that, “because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” State v. Johnson, 97- *713 1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (quoting from Judge Plotkin’s concurrence in State v. Young, 94-1636, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
State v. Thomas 13 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Roberts , 08-391 at 4-5, 996 So.2d at 1150 (citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 7 (La.3/4/98), ).
State v. Jones 7 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Batiste, 2006-0875 (La.App.
State v. Morrison 999 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; (La.
State v. Major 1 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
State v. Capers 998 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.
State v. Wharton 996 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Tassin 998 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant's sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if the trial court finds that the sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law "makes no measurable c
State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
defendant that he is “exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances [he] is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); -81 (La.1993) (holding that a trial court must reduce a defendant’s sentence to one not constitutionally excessive if th
State v. Brooks 997 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.App.
State v. Brooks 997 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.App.
State v. Roberts 996 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
State v. Robinson 996 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Batiste, 06-0875 (La.App.
State v. Lewis 990 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: A sentencing judge must always start with the presumption that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutional.
State v. Mead 988 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Number 38, 129-KW, Opinion rendered September 18, 2003, directing this Court to impose sentence as required for a and the guidelines of State v. Johnson, 97-1906, , (La.03/04/98).
State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Batiste, 06-0875 (La.App.
State v. Lay 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
3/4/98), -77 , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences under the Habitual Offender Law.
State v. Robbins 986 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.App.
State v. Hall 986 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Thomas, supra .
State v. Borden 986 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
[27] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HECTOR LEYVA-MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR L. MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR LEYVA AKA HECTOR LAZARO LEYVA MARTINEZ La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
State v. Leyva-Martinez 981 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); .
State v. Jarreau 982 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Ab 983 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 11/30/04), , citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
State ex rel. A.B. 983 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 11/30/04), , citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
State v. Dunbar 981 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
State v. Davenport 978 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.
State v. Gauthier 978 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See also State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Batiste, 06-0875 (La.App.
State v. Arabie 982 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
[14] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .