Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Stevison, 721 So. 2d 843.

41 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Joel J. Faucheux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyson Cornelison La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    10/30/98), State v. Strain, supra.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Perry Bell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    10/30/98), State v. Bruce, 03-918 (La.
  • State v. Barnett 267 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Thaddius Brock Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    See, State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98)
  • State v. Bergeron 127 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Maffett 105 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Simmons, 2005-1462 (La.3/17/06), ; State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Rosales 94 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    In State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98); -45 (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that Strain, supra, did not establish inflexible criteria or a magic word formula for determining the voluntariness of a waiver.
  • State v. Clement 1 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    In State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that Strain, supra, did not establish inflexible criteria or a magic word formula for determining the voluntariness of a waiver.
  • State v. LaGarde 970 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Palmer 963 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    See, e.g., State v. Stevison, 97-3122, p. 2 (La.10/30/98), ; see also State v. Simmons, 2005-1462 (La.3/17/06), .
  • State v. Mathieu 960 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122, p. 2 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Moore 958 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Jerred 953 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    and State v. Stevison, 1997-3132 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Mack Henry Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98)
  • State v. Johnson 944 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Perez 930 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    See State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Mendez 923 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    [22] State v. Bruce, supra (citing State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ).
  • State v. Wise 905 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    1 See, State v. Deville, 04-1401 (La.7/2/04), (per curiam) (citing State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ).
  • State v. Deville 879 So. 2d 689 La. 2004
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122, p. 1 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Todd Durio La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    10/30/98), the supreme court affirmed the validity of a predicate offense, finding that “the totality of the circumstances surrounding the 1994 guilty plea demonstrate[d] a valid waiver of the defendant’s right to counsel.” In Stevison, the defendant was not represented by counsel, and when he expressed hesitation, the
  • State v. Durio 878 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In State v. Stevison, 97-3122, p. 1 (La.10/30/98), , the supreme court affirmed the validity of a predicate offense, finding that “the totality of the circumstances surrounding the 1994 guilty plea demonstrate[d] a valid waiver of the defendant’s right to counsel.” In Stevison , the defendant was not represented by counsel, and when he expressed hesitation, the t
  • State v. Bush 873 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    See, State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Nabak 864 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    See, State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), , State v. Deroche, 96-1376, p. 1 (La.11/8/96), (per curiam), quoting State v. Strain, supra .
  • State v. Bruce 864 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Granier 857 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    *1180 In State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), , the Supreme Court noted that: [a]lthough Strain observed that "factors bearing on the validity of [the waiver] include the age, education, experience, background, competency and conduct of the accused," ...
  • State v. Perez 831 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [9] State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Kerwin 821 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    KNOWING AND VOLUNTARY WAIVER In State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a trial judge may accept a guilty plea for a misdemeanor offense from an unrepresented defendant only after the trial judge expressly advises the accused of his right to counsel, appoints counsel if he is indigent, and determines on the record that the waiver is made knowin
  • State v. Rodrigue 795 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ; (La.
  • State v. Lowry 791 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    *768 State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Brockwell 797 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Roth 786 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Stevison, 97-03122 (La.10/30/98)
  • State v. Theriot 782 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ; Garrity, 708 So.2d at 1097 .
  • State v. Pendleton 776 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ; -544 (La.1991).
  • State v. Luna 772 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), -45 .
  • State v. Frickey 769 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122, p. 2 (La.10/30/98), -45 .
  • State v. Marts 765 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122, p. 2 (La.10/30/98), -45 (citations omitted).
  • State v. McKinney 754 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Const. Art. I, § 13; State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Boudreaux 756 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ; State v. Garrity, 97-958 (La.
  • State v. Norman 756 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    [5] State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), .
  • State v. Pickett 746 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    See State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), -845 .