Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Anthony, 776 So. 2d 376.

73 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Deangelo Whitaker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    4/11/00), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 934, 121 S. Ct. 320, 148 L. Ed. 2d 258 (2000); State v. Brooks, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Briggs, III A/K/A Donald Briggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    In support of its principal theory, the state relies upon our recent holding in State v. Anthony, 98–0406 at p. 14 (La.4/11/00), cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarkus Ardoin La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana Versus Carolina Morales La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana Versus Tonny J Bauer La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Montreal Davis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
    4/11/00), (citing Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 768; 89 S.Ct.
  • State Of Louisiana v. James Bourgeois La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
  • State v. Conklin 274 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Reokenski Vodise Thomas AKA Reokenski Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Thomas 258 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua X. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Griffin 217 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Earnest G. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    4/11/00), as stating that “[t]he trial court has great discretion in ruling on cause challenges because ‘it has the benefit of seeing the facial expressions and hearing the vocal intonation of the members of the jury venire as they respond to questioning.’” 20 In t
  • State v. Hamilton 216 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/11/00), , as stating that “[t]he trial court has great discretion in ruling on cause challenges because ‘it has the benefit of seeing the facial expressions and hearing the vocal intonation of the members of the jury venire as they respond to questioning.’” 121In the present case, of all of the above prospective jurors’
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
  • State v. Dotson 187 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Anthony, 98-406, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), ; State v, Brown, 2012-0626, p. 14 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 182 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Anthony, 98-406, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Brown, 12-0626, p. 14 (La.App.
  • State v. Reeder 189 So. 3d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Wesley James Monroe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 7/31/02), (citing State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 16 (La.4/11/00), cert.
  • State v. Monroe 165 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 7/31/02), (citing State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 16 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
  • State v. Mack 144 So. 3d 983 La. 2014
    Cf. State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 13 (La.4/11/00), (“[C]on-trary to defendant’s position implying that if he did not pull the trigger, then he cannot be sentenced to death, the State is not required to show that defendant actually pulled the trigger.
  • State v. Brown 115 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Anthony, 98-406, pp. 22-23 (La.4/11/00), .
  • State v. Cleveland 115 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406, pp. 22-23 (La.4/11/00), .
  • State v. Garcia 108 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
    See, e.g., State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), (death sentence rested on, inter alia, jury’s finding defendant killed the victim during the course of an aggravated kidnapping or second-degree kidnapping); State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La.1/25/02), (patron robbed bar and killed -beer delivery man in the course); State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), (ex-employee returned to restaurant, shot four employees during armed robbery, killing three); State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.5/28/99), (exemployee re
  • State v. Turner 91 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Anthony, 98-406 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
  • State v. Martin 79 So. 3d 951 La. 2011
    See State v. Anthony, 1998-0406, p. 19 (La.4/11/00); (probable cause needed for arrest); La.
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 6/28/06), , writ denied, 06-2930 (La.9/28/07), (citing State v. Anthony, 98-406, pp. 22-23 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. David G. Sarpy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 24 (La.4/11/00)
  • State v. Sarpy 52 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 24 (La.4/11/00)
  • State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 7/31/02), (citing State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 16 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    However, the Supreme Court’s reasoning with respect to princi *141 pals to capital murder aligns precisely with this Court’s holding in State v. Anthony, 98-0406, pp. 11-14 (La.4/11/00), -87 , 29 in which this Court held the state is not required to show defendant actually pulled the trigger in order to sentence him to death in a first-degree murder prosecution.
  • State of Louisiana v. George Earl White, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/1/06), this court explained, in pertinent part: In State v. Anthony, 98-406, pp. 19-20 (La.4/11/00), -90 (alteration in original), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: A custodial arrest must be supported by probable cause, Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200, 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Tatum 40 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 4/11/00), , cert.
  • State v. Ard 15 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    art. 402, State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 15 (La.4/11/2000), .
  • State v. Butler 15 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), .
  • State v. Raymond 13 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The Louisiana Supreme Court succinctly summarized the law on challenges for cause based on a relationship in State v. Anthony, 98-406, p. 24 (La.4/11/00), , cert denied, 531 U.S. 934 , 121 S.Ct.
  • State v. Smith 13 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    The Supreme Court's reasoning with respect to principals to capital murder comports with this Court's holding in State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), -87 (holding that the State is not required to show defendant actually pulled the trigger in order to sentence him to death in a first-degree murder prosecution; instead to carry its burden of proof successfully, the State must prove defendant acted in concert with his co-perpetrators, that defendant had the speci
  • State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
    'd); State v. Marcus Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), (aff'd); State v. Derek Landry, 97-0499 (La.6/29/99), (rev'd); State v. Rogers LaCaze, 99-0584 (La.1/25/02), (aff'd); State v. Shareef Cousin, 96-2973 (La.4/14/98), (rev'd); State v. Juan Smith, 98-1417 (La.6/29/01), (aff'd); State v. Phillip Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), (aff'd).
  • State v. Lindsey 948 So. 2d 105 La. 2007
    Kang , 02-2812, at p. 5, 859 So.2d at 653 ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 24 (La.4/11/00)
  • State of Louisiana v. Lisa Landry Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 24 (La.4/11/00)
  • State v. Johnson 941 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 24 (La.4/11/00)
  • State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Bozeman, 866 So.2d at 1032 , citing State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), .
  • State v. Smith 934 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 24 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
  • State v. Slaydon 921 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In State v. Anthony, 98-406, pp. 19-20 (La.4/11/00), -90 (alteration in original), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: A custodial arrest must be supported by probable cause, Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Slaydon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    4/11/00), -90 (alteration in original), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: A custodial arrest must be supported by probable cause, Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200, 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Burd 921 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    See also State v. Anthony, 98-406 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
  • State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406, pp. 11-14 (La.4/11/00), -87 ; -58 (La.1983).
  • State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 24 (La.4/11/00), , cert.