DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Carlos, 738 So. 2d 556.

90 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Sarah Tyner La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    7/7/99), and State v. Shelton, 92-3070 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Joel J. Faucheux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    7/7/99), the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted and applied a three-step burden shifting process to determine the validity of prior DWI guilty pleas used in enhanced DWI 25-CA-143 2 proceedings.2 See also State v. Balsano, 09-735 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jerome Lee Manuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    7/7/99), the supreme court established the burden of proof for a defendant’s challenge to the state’s use of a prior offense.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Stacy Raymund Clark La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
    99), the Louisiana Supreme Court eased the State' s burden of proving a prior DWI guilty plea as a predicate offense for enhancement purposes.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Ricky Joseph, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. George Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99)
  • State Of Louisiana v. Aaron Wayne Bush La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    7/ 7/ 99), the Louisiana Supreme Court eased the State' s burden of proving a prior DWI guilty plea as a predicate offense for enhancement purposes.
  • State v. Peters 253 So. 3d 785 La. 2018
  • State v. Granier 228 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Billups 188 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    See also State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.07/07/99), .
  • State v. Granier 178 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), , the Supreme Court held that for recidivist DWI prosecutions, the State may satisfy its burden of production and persuasion by producing proof of a prior DWI conviction by way |aof a counseled guilty plea.
  • State v. Boyd 171 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366, p. 6 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Easter 170 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In State v. Carlos, 1998-1366 (La.7/7/99), , the Louisiana Supreme | are applicable to multiple-offense DWI cases.
  • State v. Watkins 146 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    133Under the Shelton three-step process as to habitual offender sentence enhancement (and the identical three-step process under State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99) , where the court applied Shelton to DWI sentence enhancement), the only “burden” spoken of as to the defendant prior to Balsano was the burden — shifted to the defendant upon the state presenting evidence of the fact of the prior guilty plea by the defendant (whether Louisiana or out-of-state conviction) and *314 tha
  • State v. Marlbrough 138 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    15:529.1, or in habitual offender DWI prosecutions, State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Boudreaux 131 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    15:529.1, or in habitual offender DWI prosecutions, State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Dillon 101 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    3 State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Rosales 94 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    DISCUSSION The State argues Defendant did not meet his burden under State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99); , by failing to produce affirmative evidence for either predicate plea that he suffered an infringement of his Boykin 4 rights because he did not understand the English language and he was not advised of potential deportation consequences by the court or his attorneys.
  • State v. Jenkins 91 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Carlos, 98-1366, pp. 6-8 (La.7/7/99), -60 .
  • State v. Welch 57 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    (1993); State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Domino 60 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    prosecutions, State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Wetzel 54 So. 3d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Robert 42 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Balsano 11 So. 3d 475 La. 2009
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Tassin 998 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In State v. Carlos, 98-1366, pp. 6-7 (La.7/7/99), (footnotes omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the burdens of proof in recidivism proceedings as follows: In Shelton [ v. Shelton, ], this Court recognized that Boykin [ v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Deandre Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    7/7/99), (footnotes omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the burdens of proof in recidivism proceedings as follows: In Shelton, this Court recognized that Boykin does not require that the entire burden be placed on the prosecution in a recidivism proceeding.
  • State v. Johnson 996 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In considering this assignment of error, we are guided by the supreme court decision in State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Price 996 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Carlos, XXXX-XXXX (La.07/07/99), .
  • State v. Swayzer 989 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Ostrom 980 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Though Mobley can be argued as directly on point, requiring reduction of the present DWI offense to a first offense DWI, we choose, as set forth below, to limit the undetailed per curiam ruling in Mobley for two reasons-one factual and the other because of the later thorough discussion of the DWI law given by the high court in State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Thomas Swaggart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Swaggart 956 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366, p. 6-7 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Perez 930 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Duplechin 922 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court extended the burden-shifting principles applicable to habitual offenders, to the recidivist provisions of the DWI statute.
  • State v. Nelson 917 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [2] State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Watson 911 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Wise 905 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Perez 895 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Payton 894 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Johnson 887 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), ; State v. Shelton, supra .
  • State v. Collins 886 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State v. Picard 897 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    See also State v. Carlos, 98-1366, pp. 6-8 (La.7/7/99), -60 .
  • State v. Deville 879 So. 2d 689 La. 2004
    In State v. Carlos, 98-1366 *691 (La.7/7/99), , we held that for recidivist D.W.I.
  • State v. Deville 879 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR The state argues that under State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), and State v. Zachary, 01-3191 (La.10/25/02), (per curiam), it only needed to prove the fact of conviction and that defendant waived counsel at the time he entered his plea in order to use a prior guilty plea to establish a predicate offense under the DWI statute.
  • State v. Vaughn 879 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court eased the state’s burden of proving a prior DWI guilty plea as a predicate offense for enhancement purposes.
  • State v. Bush 873 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Fred Christopher Beverly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    7/7/99), the supreme court established the burden of proof for a defendant’s challenge to the state’s use of a prior offense.
  • State v. Beverly 867 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), , the supreme court established the burden of proof for a defendant's challenge to the state's use of a prior offense.
  • State v. Frisella 868 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    In State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court extended the burden-shifting principles applicable to habitual offenders, -780 (La.1993), to the recidivist provisions of the DWI statute.