Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 594 So. 2d 1.
- State v. Stevens 978 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State v. Ware 980 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State v. Sampy 978 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State v. DHB 977 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
State of Louisiana v. Kimberly Sampy
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Ware
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.”
-
State of Louisiana v. D. H. B.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Charles Joseph Stevens
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State v. Seay
977 So. 2d 309
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
-
State v. Sloan
977 So. 2d 310
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
-
State v. Carmouche
977 So. 2d 310
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
- State v. DARCE 977 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State v. JLC 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
State of Louisiana v. Tasha Jane Darce
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. J.L.C.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense 2 committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Brian Carmouche
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Alvernon Sloan, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Alfonso M. Simon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Trent Everett Seay
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Senegal 972 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may -10- provide some insight, “[i]t is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
- State v. Hicks 977 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Lawrence J. Joseph
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jessie J. Hicks
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Suire 966 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Brian Joseph Suire
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Farrell J. Guilbeau
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State v. Northcutt
966 So. 2d 170
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Johnny Otis Washington
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Eddie W. Northcutt
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Office 967 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Brandon J. Office
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Raymond O'Neal Green
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Haiming Luo
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may 2 provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Eric Harrison
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Hawkins 956 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Tracey H. Westfall
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Demarco D. Hawkins
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State v. Westfall
956 So. 2d 173
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Noel 952 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Bradley James Noel
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Despanie 949 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Donavan Despanie
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Authement 950 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Roland A. Authement, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “[i]t is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Diallo McCoy
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may 5 provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Davis 947 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Derick Dewayne Davis
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Brister 946 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Runyon 944 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006