Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 594 So. 2d 1.

544 citing documents.

  • State v. Stevens 978 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Ware 980 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Sampy 978 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. DHB 977 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Kimberly Sampy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Ware La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.”
  • State of Louisiana v. D. H. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Joseph Stevens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Seay 977 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Batiste , (La.App.
  • State v. Sloan 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Batiste , (La.App.
  • State v. Carmouche 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Batiste , (La.App.
  • State v. DARCE 977 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. JLC 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Tasha Jane Darce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. J.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense 2 committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Alvernon Sloan, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Alfonso M. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Trent Everett Seay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Senegal 972 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may -10- provide some insight, “[i]t is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
  • State v. Hicks 977 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Lawrence J. Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jessie J. Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Suire 966 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Joseph Suire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Farrell J. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Northcutt 966 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Batiste , (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Johnny Otis Washington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Eddie W. Northcutt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Office 967 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Brandon J. Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Raymond O'Neal Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Haiming Luo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may 2 provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Harrison La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Hawkins 956 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Tracey H. Westfall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Demarco D. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Westfall 956 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Noel 952 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Bradley James Noel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Despanie 949 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Donavan Despanie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Authement 950 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Roland A. Authement, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “[i]t is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Diallo McCoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may 5 provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 947 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Derick Dewayne Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Brister 946 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Runyon 944 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006