Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Acosta v. B & B Oilfield Services, Inc., 91 So. 3d 1263.

18 citing documents.

Peter Miller and Devan Miller v. Succession of Carol J. Aymond, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
J. Cory Cordovoa, M.D. v. Lafayette General Health, Inc., University Hospitals & Clinics, Inc., Lafayette General Medical Center,inc. … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Andre Pierce v. Buck Kreihs Company, Inc., Abc Insurance Company, Economy Iron Works, Inc., and Def Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 3 Cir. 6/6/12), the Third Circuit found that the appeal, challenging the imposition of sanctions and the amount thereof, failed to present a substantial legal question and warranted appellate sanctions.
Louisiana State University System Board of Supervisors Through Louisiana State University Veterinarian Teaching Hospital v. Robert Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3 Cir. 6/6/12), (quoting Thibodeaux v. Billiott, 04–1308, p. 8 (La.App.
Molinere v. Lapeyrouse 214 So. 3d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Edward Perkins v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 6/6/12), wherein we affirmed an award of sanctions after the attorney continued to pursue litigation after he learned his position had no merit.
Perkins v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 189 So. 3d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 6/6/12) , , wherein we affirmed an award of sanctions after the *539 attorney continued to pursue litigation after he learned his position had no merit.
Carol J. Cj" Vincent v. Cse Federal Credit Union " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Benjamin B. Blanchet v. Henry Albert Boudreaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 6/6/12), David v. David, 14-657 (La.App.
Blanchet v. Boudreaux 175 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 6/6/12) , ; David v. David, 14-657 (La.
In Re: Wk and Wskjr Apply for Intrafamily Adoption of Wskiii La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 6/6/12), ” David v. David, 14-999, p. 7 (La.App.
W.K. v. L.L. 165 So. 3d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 6/6/12) , .” David v. David, 14-999, p. 7 (La.App.
Dione W. David v. Richard G. David La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
David v. David 157 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Richard G. David v. Dione W. David La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/6/12), : When considering the imposition of sanctions on appeal, an appellate court must apply two standards of review which are explained as follows: A trial court’s determination regarding the imposition of sanctions is subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong
David v. David 156 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/6/12), , 1267: When considering the imposition of sanctions on appeal, an appellate court must apply two standards of review which are explained as follows: A trial court’s determination regarding the imposition of sanctions is subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of review.
Carolyn Deal v. Hon. J. Phillip Haney, D.A La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/6/12), this court stated: When considering the imposition of sanctions on appeal, an appellate court must apply two standards of review which are explained as follows: A trial court’s determination regarding the imposition of sanctions is subject to the mani
Deal v. Haney 158 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/6/12), , this court stated: When considering the imposition of sanctions on appeal, an appellate court must apply two standards of review which are explained as follows: A trial court’s determination regarding the imposition of sanctions is subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of review.