Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lewis, 48 So. 3d 1073.

38 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. John Honore La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Caiden J Fruge La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Armond Jamar Burgy La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    10/22/10), State v. Lanclos, 419 So.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyler Nicholas Benoit La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    10/22/10), a sixteen- year-old male watched a fight between friends, Bush and Crain, as a bystander.
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel Ralph Haire La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    10/22/10), and by this court in State v. Gaines, 52,536 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald West La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
    10/22/10), –78 (“In considering the nature of the offense, both the trial court and reviewing court may assess whether the crime for which defendant has been convicted adequately describes his conduct when the conviction is for a lesser included responsive offense to the crime charged[,]” while “accord[ing] paramount im
  • State of Louisiana v. Dillon Floyd Bazar La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
    10/22/10), and by this court in State v. Gaines, 52,536 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Jermaine Green La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
    10/22/10), -78, the proper perspective from which to approach sentence review in the present case accords paramount importance to the nature of the conduct proved at trial.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Maurice T. Leach AKA "marlo" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. El Jerico Jermiah Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Sam Clark, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Daniels 275 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    10/22/10), , 1078 (citing State v. Lanclos , , 478 (La.
  • State v. Gaines 266 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul Knatt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    10/22/10), a sixteen-year-old male watched a fight between friends, Bush and Crain, as a bystander.
  • State v. Knatt 265 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    10/22/10), , a sixteen-year-old male watched a fight between friends, Bush and Crain, as a bystander.
  • State of Louisiana v. Katron v. Richard A/K/A Katron Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Katron 265 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State v. Baugh 262 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    10/22/10), , 1078, the Court quoted Porter , 93-1106, p. 4, 639 So.2d at 1140 : "Treating the jury's prerogative to return a responsive verdict similar to the jury's power of nullification, this court has consistently held that the jury must be given the option to convict the defendant of the lesser offense, even though the evid
  • State v. Little 252 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Becnel 250 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    10/22/10), , 1078 (citing State v. Lanclos , , 478 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ryan Christopher Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    10/22/10), (reinstated a thirty-year sentence for a sixteen year old defendant who shot a friend in the head).
  • State v. Gaines 247 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Deonta Ware La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    State v. Lewis, 09-1404 (La.10/22/10), - 1078.
  • State of Louisiana v. Austin Benjamin Cedars La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    10/22/10), the supreme court reinstated a thirty-year sentence for manslaughter where the defendant had picked up a gun while watching two friends fight and shot one of the combatants in the head, killing him.
  • State v. Walker 206 So. 3d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    10/22/10), ; State v. Bright, 98-0398 (La.
  • State v. Garrison 184 So. 3d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    granted, 09-1404 (La.04/30/10), , aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 09-1404 (La.10/22/10), (Defendant, a 16-year-old first-time offender, was | ^convicted of manslaughter after killing an eighteen-year-old and received a thirty-year sentence.)
  • State v. Rouser 158 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In State v. Lewis, 09-1404 (La.10/22/10), , a sixteen-year-old male *874 watched a fight between friends, Bush and Crain, as a bystander.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Hopkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Ross 137 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See State v. Lewis, 09-1404, p. 8 (La.10/22/10), ("Treating the jury’s prerogative to return a responsive verdict similar to the jury's power of nullification, this court has consistently held that the jury must be given the option to convict the defendant of the lesser offense, even though the evidence clearly and overwhelmingly supported a conviction of the
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Osborn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/22/10), a sixteen-year-old male watched a fight between friends, Bush and Crain, as a bystander.
  • State v. Osborn 127 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In State v. Lewis, 09-1404 (La.10/22/10), , a sixteen-year-old male watched a fight between friends, Bush and Crain, as a bystander.
  • State v. Pham 119 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    See also State v. Lewis, 09-1404 (La.10/22/10); , where the Louisiana Supreme Court reinstated the 16-year-old first time offender’s sentence, originally vacated by this Court, finding that the trial court acted within its discretion when it imposed a 30-year sentence for defendant’s manslaughter conviction.
  • State v. Carmouche 117 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    An analysis of the issue herein is found in State v. Lewis, 09-1404 (La.10/22/10), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal James Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Harris 105 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    In State v. Lewis, 09-1404 (La.10/22/10); , cited by the State, the Louisiana Supreme Court reinstated the 16-year-old first time offender’s sentence, originally vacated by this Court, finding that the trial court acted within its discretion when it imposed a 30-year sentence for defendant’s manslaughter conviction.
  • State v. Jones 81 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Lewis, 2009-1404 (La.10/22/10), ; State v. Brown, 42,054 (La.App.
  • State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Contrast the broad statement in the cases cited above, that specific intent to kill may be inferred from a defendant’s pointing and firing a gun at a person, with the narrower statement in a more recent decision by the Louisiana Supreme Court, State v. Lewis, 2009-1404 (La.10/22/10), , that it is “settled jurisprudence that specific intent to kill may be inferred from the act of pointing a gun and firing at a person in close proximity.” Lewis, 2009-1404, p. 5, 48 So.3d at 1076 (emphasis added) (
  • State v. Jones 80 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Lewis, 2009-1404 (La.10/22/10), ; State v. Germany, 43,239 (La.App.2d Cir.4/30/08), .