Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hankton, 140 So. 3d 398.

14 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Wanda Ledet La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerard Hill La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
    App. 4 28 Cir. 4/20/14), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Devion D Taylor La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Kelvin Atkins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarkus Ardoin La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
    App. 4 Cir. 4/30/14), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry Delanta Gardner, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
    App. 4 Cir. 4/30/14), writ denied, 14-1062 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Orlando Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    App. 4 Cir. 4/30/14), the defendant contacted the police department to report concerns for a 76-year old for whom she was the caretaker.
  • State of Louisiana in the Interest of S.C.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    App. 4 Cir. 4/30/14), (quoting State v. McNair, 12-0064, p. 12 (La.
  • State v. Kinard 214 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4 Cir. 4/30/14) , , this Court recognized the following guidelines to determine whether a defendant was subject to a custodial interrogation: The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, [§ ] 5 of the Louisiana Constitution protect persons against unreasonable searches and seizures.
  • State v. Wells 191 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 4/30/14), (even if defendant’s statement had been improperly admitted, hér testimony at trial, which was corroborative, rendered admission harmless).
  • State v. Woodberry 171 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Bruce 169 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State ex rel. J.D. 154 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 4/30/14), , this Court stated: The obligation to provide Miranda warnings attaches only when a person is questioned by law enforcement after he has been taken “into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.” Miranda, supra, 384 U.S. at 444, 86 S.Ct.
  • State v. Harris 151 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 4/30/14), (“It is the jury’s province to weigh the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses and its finding will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.”) (citing State v. Barnes, 11-1421 (La.App.