Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 115 So. 3d 564.

24 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jimmie Dixon, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
4 Cir. 4/10/13), (citation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Samir Melendez La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), ).
State of Louisiana v. Kentrell Hickerson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), -71, this Court explained: The reviewing court must consider the record as a whole.
State of Louisiana v. Dave A. Turner La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), that the trial court is vested with considerable discretion in ruling on a motion for continuance, and the reviewing 19 court will not disturb the trial court's ruling absent a clear abuse of that discretion.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.P. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), -71, we set forth the Jackson standard as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could h
State v. Daniels 262 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), , 570-71 (citing Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Andrews (In re Andrews) 255 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), , 575.
State ex rel. W.S. 250 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), , 570-71, we set forth the standard as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), , 570-71, we set forth the standard of review for claims of insufficiency as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could h
State ex rel. W.B. 206 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), 573 (citing State v. Leger, 2005-0011, p. 44 (La.
State v. Jackson 193 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App. 4 Cir. 4/10/13), ; State v. Reeves, 06-2419, p. 73 (La.5/5/09), ).
State v. Dotson 187 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Jones 182 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Griffin 176 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 4/10/13) , -74 (setting forth the applicable jurisprudence on ineffective assistance of counsel).
State v. Canales 156 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State ex rel. J.D. 154 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/10/13), 573 (citing State v. Leger, 2005-0011, p. 44 (La.7/10/06), ).
State v. Jasper 149 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/10/13), -71 , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Falkins 146 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/10/18), ; State v. Reeves, 2006-2419, p. 73 (La.5/5/09), -1079 .
Keith v. Keith 140 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Larry Walker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/10/13), the fourth circuit upheld a six-year sentence for Brown’s simple burglary of a storage shed, during which Brown stole $130.00 worth of soft drinks and bottled water.
State v. Wilson 138 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Nellum 136 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/10/13), -71 , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. German 133 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/10/13), ; State v. Reeves, 06-2419, p. 73 (La.5/5/09), .
State v. Biddy 129 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 4/10/13), -71 , set forth the standard for evaluating a sufficiency of the evidence claim as follows: *776 In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier