Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watermeier v. Watermeier, 464 So. 2d 301.
-
Gwendolyn Diamond v. Decarrious Byrcious Jenkins
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
-
Elizabeth LeBlanc Schroeder v. Alan Conrad Schroeder
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, ( La.
- Brandy Megan Broussard Wadsworth v. Christopher David Wadsworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
-
Shanika Edmond v. Dominique Edmond
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, La.
- Susana F. Moody v. Ross Moody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
-
Wendy Marie Martinez Couvillon v. Michael Andre Couvillon
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, ( La.
-
State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.N., M.N., and Z.O.
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, La.
-
Amber Leger v. Kyle Brandon Leger
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
2d 1272 ( La.App, 5 Cir.), writ denied, ( La.
-
Crystal Rose Moffett v. Marcus Delaney Moffett
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5 Cir.) writ denied, (La.
-
State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.N. & B.N.
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
for the children explained at the outset of the July 2020 adjudication that the children were “present today in court, but are in the D.A.’s office in the playroom.” Immediately after the juvenile court granted the father’s motion for a “directed verdict,” the State asked the court for written reasons; the court “note[d] the State’s objection”; and counsel 9 (La.
-
Dimitri I. Ikonitski v. Kateryna Ikonitski
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, ( La.
-
Raymond Smith v. Holly Farish
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, ( La.
-
Jones v. Jones
274 So. 3d 811
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5th Cir.), writ denied , (La.
-
State v. Titus
274 So. 3d 591
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5th Cir. 1985), writ denied , (La.
-
S.L.B. v. C.E.B.
252 So. 3d 950
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied, the sequestration of parents was held to be an appropriate compromise of conflicting interests where the witness was a six year old, whose very competency to testify was at issue.
-
State ex rel. N.C.
184 So. 3d 760
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
5th Cir.1985), writ denied, the Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal discussed the testimony of children in custody cases.
-
Christina Marie Sorrells, Born Richard v. Steven Ray Sorrells
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
5 Cir.), writ denied, the issue was whether, during a custody hearing and over the objection of counsel for one of the parties, the trial court could conduct an unrecorded, in-chambers interview of the minor children.
-
Sorrells v. Sorrells
178 So. 3d 288
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir.), wñt denied, the issue was whether, during a custody hearing and over the objection of counsel for one of the parties, the trial court could conduct an unrecorded, in-chambers interview of the minor children.
-
Wilson v. Wilson
170 So. 3d 340
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir.), writ denied, that the interview of a child must be conducted in chambers and in the presence of the parties’ attorneys, acting only as observers once the judge has de *347 termined that the child is competent.
- Shana J. Toups v. Bobby Dean Toups La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- In re D.C.M. 170 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
Penn v. Penn
28 So. 3d 304
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir.1985), writ denied
-
Woods v. Woods
987 So. 2d 339
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
5th Cir.), writ denied, (La.
-
In re Cresap
940 So. 2d 624
La. 2006
5 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
- Gs v. Ts 900 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- G. S. v. T. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- G.S. v. T.S. 900 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-
Brown v. Brown
877 So. 2d 1228
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
5 Cir.), writ denied, as the standard for the use of testimony of children in custody cases.
-
Weaver v. Weaver
824 So. 2d 438
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
5 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
-
State Ex Rel. Gjl
791 So. 2d 80
La. 2001
5 Cir.1985), writ denied
- Nail v. Clavier 745 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Hicks v. Hicks 733 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
-
Raney v. Wren
722 So. 2d 54
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5 Cir.), writ denied, (1985), the court established guidelines for taking the testimony of children in a custody dispute: [T]he interview must be conducted in chambers outside of the presence of the parents, but in the presence of their attorneys, with a record being made by the court reporter.
-
Gould v. Gould
687 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
5th Cir.), writ denied (1985), the court held that such examinations must be made with the attorneys present to *689 determine the child's competency to testify, and that a transcript must be made of the interview.
-
Fuge v. Uiterwyk
653 So. 2d 707
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
5th Cir.1985), writ denied, the sequestration of parents was held to be an appropriate compromise of conflicting interests where the witness was a six year old, whose very competency to testify was at issue.
-
Rodgers v. Rodgers
643 So. 2d 764
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
App. 5th Cir.1985), writ denied, should be followed unless there is no objection.
- Lyons v. Lyons 571 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Simmons v. Simmons
554 So. 2d 238
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
5th Cir. 1985), writ denied, our brethern of the Fifth Circuit addressed the trial court's private interview of a child of tender age without having a record made, and stated: "[T]he appellate court, would be forced to trust completely and without reservation the discretion of the trial judge as to the propriety of his questions, his a
-
Diggs v. Tyler
525 So. 2d 1263
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
5th Cir.), writ denied, the court established the following guidelines for taking the testimony of children out of the presence of a parent: [T]he interview must be conducted in chambers outside of the presence of the *1266 parents, but in the presence of their attorneys, with a record being made by the court reporter.
-
Drewett v. Drewett
524 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
5th Cir.1985), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Dykes v. Dykes
488 So. 2d 368
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
5th Cir.1985), writ denied