Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Burns, 441 So. 2d 843.
-
State of Louisiana v. Dequincy Jamel Lewis
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Ledet, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Stefan Jermaine Briggs A/K/A Stefan Briggs
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Donald Briggs, III A/K/A Donald Briggs
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kendall D. Singleton A/K/A Kendall Singleton
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Markus O. Andrews
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Marcel N. Dugar
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Braylen Marquez Leday
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Steven Dwayne Rigmaiden
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Dewayne Brown
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Exzavian Burnette
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. James Derek Person, II
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ron Cleon Johnson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen McPhearson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be 3 inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. David Anthony Burns
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Marvin Watson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jewel Demon Humphrey
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Sedrick R. Tennessee
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael J. Worley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Charles P. Mayeux, Jr. AKA Charles P. Mayeux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State v. Mayeux
265 So. 3d 1096
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Burns , , 845 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jacob Dewayne Purvis
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State v. Purvis
217 So. 3d 470
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jon Wray Baumberger
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common 10 sense.” (La.App.
-
State v. Baumberger
200 So. 3d 817
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which *827 elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common |usense” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Brown
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. M S
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
12/16/11), this court noted: “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Devon McCray
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Rickey D. Arvie
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 6/1/11), ___ So.3d ___, this court stated: ―Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.‖ (La.App.
-
State v. Arvie
73 So. 3d 516
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 6/1/11), , this court stated: “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ron Stewart Martin
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
-
State v. Martin
66 So. 3d 608
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
- State v. Dixon 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- State v. Boutte 564 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990