Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Burns, 441 So. 2d 843.

36 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Dequincy Jamel Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Ledet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Stefan Jermaine Briggs A/K/A Stefan Briggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Briggs, III A/K/A Donald Briggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kendall D. Singleton A/K/A Kendall Singleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Markus O. Andrews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcel N. Dugar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Braylen Marquez Leday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven Dwayne Rigmaiden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Dewayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Exzavian Burnette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. James Derek Person, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ron Cleon Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen McPhearson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be 3 inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. David Anthony Burns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marvin Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jewel Demon Humphrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Sedrick R. Tennessee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael J. Worley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles P. Mayeux, Jr. AKA Charles P. Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State v. Mayeux 265 So. 3d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    State v. Burns , , 845 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jacob Dewayne Purvis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State v. Purvis 217 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jon Wray Baumberger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common 10 sense.” (La.App.
  • State v. Baumberger 200 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which *827 elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common |usense” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. M S La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    12/16/11), this court noted: “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Devon McCray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Rickey D. Arvie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 6/1/11), ___ So.3d ___, this court stated: ―Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.‖ (La.App.
  • State v. Arvie 73 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 6/1/11), , this court stated: “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ron Stewart Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State v. Martin 66 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    “Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which elemental factors may be inferred according to reason, experience and common sense.” (La.App.
  • State v. Dixon 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Boutte 564 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990