Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wooley v. Lucksinger, 61 So. 3d 507.

302 citing documents.

Savoie v. Richard 137 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571, 09-584, 09-585, 09-586, pp. 81-82 (La.4/1/11), (quoting Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 07-2110, p. 6 (La.5/21/08), )(alteration in original).
Aisola v. Beacon Hospital Management, Inc. 140 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571, p. 77 (La.4/1/11), (“Judgments are often upheld on appeal for reasons different than those assigned by the district judges”).
Watkins v. Lake Charles Memorial Hospital 144 So. 3d 944 La. 2014
See Wooley v. Luclcsinger, 2009-0571 (La.4/1/11), -54 .
Eschete v. Eschete 142 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wooley v. Luck-singer, 09-0571 (La.4/1/11), .
Williams v. Board of Supervisors of University of Louisiana System 135 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.04/01/11), ; Adams, supra.
Barber v. Green 134 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
See Woo-ley v. Lucksinger, 2009-0571 (La.4/1/11), .
Sacco v. Paxton 133 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 2009-0571, p. 81 (La.4/1/11), (citing Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 2007-2110, p. 6 (La.5/21/08), ).
Oliver v. Orleans Parish School Board 133 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.4/1/11), .
Oleszkowicz v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 129 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
neous jury instruction was given requires consideration of the targeted portion of the instruction in the context of the entire jury charge “to determine if the charges adequately provide the correct principles of law as applied to the issues framed in the pleadings and the evidence and whether the charges adequately guided the jury in its determination.” Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571 (La.4/1/11); .
Davis v. State Board of Certified Public Accountants 131 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
See Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571, p. 49 (La.4/1/11), .
Snider v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance 130 So. 3d 922 La. 2013
See Wooley v. Lucksinger, 2009-0571 (La.4/1/11), -54 .
Lynch-Ballard v. Lammico Insurance Agency, Inc. 131 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.4/1/11), .
Timothy Cormier v. McNeese State University La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Harley-Davison Credit Corp. v. Morris Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Dr. Carlton L. Winbery v. Dr. Leon Hyatt, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Winbery v. Louisiana College 124 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the rea *1218 sons for judgment.” Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571, 09-584, 09-585, 09-586, p. 77 (La.4/1/11), .
Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. v. Davis 127 So. 3d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571, 09-584, 09-585, 09-586 (La.4/1/11), .
City of Gretna v. Morice 128 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir.1987); Wooley v. Luck-singer, 09-0571 (La.4/1/11), ; Bellard v. American Cent.
Joseph B. Freeman, Jr. v. Block T" Operating " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Freeman v. Block "T" Operating, LLC 118 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.4/1/11), .
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. 144 So. 3d 791 La. 2013
Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), ; see also, Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571, 09-0584, 09-0585, 09-0586, p. 82 (La.4/1/11), .
Royal Oldsmobile Co. v. Heisler Properties, L.L.C. 119 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.4/1/11), , reh’g denied (4/29/2011).
Landix v. Blunt 112 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The deference afforded the trial court’s “reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact” is “based, in part, on the trial court’s ability to better evaluate the testimony of live witnesses, compared with an appellate court’s sole reliance upon a written record.” Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571, p. 50 (La.4/1/11), .
Doe v. Louisiana Board of Ethics 112 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571, p. 77 (La.4/1/11), .
Claiborne Medical Corp. v. Siddiqui 113 So. 3d 1109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Wooley *1113 v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.4/1/11), ; Bellard v. American Cent.
Davis v. Recreation Department 107 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571, 09-0584-0586, p. 68 (La.4/1/11), (citing Nicholas v. Allstate Ins.
Davidson v. Glenwood Resolution Authority, Inc. 108 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 2009-0571 (La.4/1/11), ; Bellard v. American Cent.
Conn-Barr, LLC v. Diana Istre Francis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4/1/11), (quoting Sims v. Mulhearn Funeral Home, Inc., 07-0054 (La.
Bcm, L.L.C. v. Roy Clifton Cheatwood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Conn-Barr, LLC v. Francis 103 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.4/1/11), (quoting Sims v. Mulhearn Funeral Home, Inc., 07-0054 (La.5/22/07), ).
Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General Ex Rel. State of Louisiana v. Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4/1/11), and Townes v. Liberty Mut.
Caldwell ex rel. State v. Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. 100 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571, 09-584, 09-585, 09-586 (La.4/1/11), and Townes v. Liberty Mut.
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. 103 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
See also, Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571, 09-0584, 09-0585, 09-0586 (La.4/1/11), .
Eddie Rusk v. Delores Rusk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Rusk v. Rusk 102 So. 3d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571 (La.4/1/11), .
Brassette v. Exnicios 92 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wooley *1084 v. Lucksinger, 09-571 (La.4/1/11), ; A Better Place
Joseph v. Kent 89 So. 3d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
ry amount in attorney’s fees, the trial court’s judgment is silent as to the fees and merely awards “attorney’s fees.” The Supreme Court recently reiterated the “ ‘well-settled rule that the district court’s oral or written reasons for judgment form no part of the judgment, and that appellate courts review judgments, not reasons for judgment.’ ” Wooley v. Lucksinger, 2009-0571, p. 77 (La.4/1/11), , quoting Bellard v. American Cent.
Arabie v. CITGO Petroleum Corp. 89 So. 3d 307 La. 2012
We recently examined the interplay of factors contained in Article 3542 in our opinion in Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571 (La.4/1/11), .
Melissa Horacek v. Davelyn Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Horacek v. Watson 86 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571 (La.4/1/11), .
City of Lafayette v. Sam B. Wofford, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
City of Lafayette v. Wofford 84 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 2164; Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571 (La.4/1/11), .
Lewis v. TEMPLE INLAND 80 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
9 However, given the record as it presently exists herein, and because the parties have not been afforded the opportunity to brief this issue, see generally Wooley v. Lucksinger, 2009-0571, 2009-0584, 2009-0585, 2009-0586 (La.4/1/11), -563 , we decline to vacate the portion of the judgment rendered only against these individuals.
Gregory Mouton v. Encompass Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Lee J. Monlezun, M.D. v. Lyon Interests, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Monlezun v. Lyon Interests, Inc. 76 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
However, even assuming that the trial court’s finding was in error, “the mere discovery of an error does not, of itself, automatically equate with prejudice, nor does the mere discovery of an error justify an appellate court’s de novo review.” Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571, 09-584, 09-545, 09-586, p. 92 (La.4/1/11), .
MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1173 La. 2011
Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571 (La.4/1/11), ; A Better Place
Morton v. Hicks 74 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
1918, 2082, 2083; Wooley v. Lucksinger, 2009-0571 (La.4/1/11), ; Howard v. Willis-Knighton Med.
Cole v. Mitchell 73 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.04/01/11), .
LOUTRE LAND AND TIMBER CO. v. Roberts 72 So. 3d 403 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Without doubt, an appellate court has the authority to raise an issue sua sponte on appeal.” Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.4/1/11), .