Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lambert, 720 So. 2d 724.

239 citing documents.

State v. Francois 114 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Anthony St. Romain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime
State v. St. Romain 157 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
State of Louisiana v. James R Francis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Ernest Joseph Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Ronald G. Acker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27, this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements
State of Louisiana v. Brent Authorlee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Francis 111 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Authorlee 111 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Arceneaux 111 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Acker 111 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 , this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a re
State of Louisiana v. Rosheed Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 9/30/98), - 27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime pr
State v. Guillory 129 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
State of Louisiana v. Willis J. Mouton AKA Willis James Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Mouton 129 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Stanley Charles Young, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. James Lee Burks, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Lazaro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Dexter Holder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Lazaro 125 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Jeremiah R. Teno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Teno 101 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Holder 101 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Francis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan L.citizen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Diondre D. Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could
State of Louisiana v. Larry Joseph McKithern La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. McKithern 93 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Terry L. Clarkson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS H. O.,aka J. O., AKA H. B.,aka H. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Clarkson 86 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), ).
State of Louisiana v. Michael D. Patterson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Patterson 83 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. David Lynn Saucier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Saucier 81 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 .
State v. Shelton 75 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Courtney Paul Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27); see also State v. Turner, 04-1250 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. A. D. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27, set forth the following: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential
State v. A.D.L. 64 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 , set forth the following: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven bey
State of Louisiana v. C. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27, this court stated: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could
State v. C.S. 50 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 , this court stated: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a
State of Louisiana v. Edward D. Gresham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. B. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27, this court stated: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elemen
State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Kivin Nixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier o
State of Louisiana v. R. R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. RR 37 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. R.R. 37 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Wendell Bourque La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010