Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 846 So. 2d 786.

692 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jarman Gerard Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State v. Thomas 63 So. 3d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no mean
  • State v. Jones 63 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citation omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Courville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Felton Hurst, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State v. Hurst 62 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99-2019, 99-2094 (La.7/6/00), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Denna L. Decuir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 12 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Sherrel King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State v. King 61 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court held that in order to [3decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [T]he nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the
  • State v. Decuir 61 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua Derrick Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. George Jameson Gray, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State v. Davis 58 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , urrit denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Anthony Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , unit denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Jay Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. A.B.M., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Henry D. Gilmore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Douglas L. Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State v. A.B.M. 52 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Clark 52 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Gilmore 54 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99-2019, 99-2094 (La.7/6/00), ), this court provided a list of factors that may be considered when determining whether a sentence was excessive: “the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender
  • State of Louisiana v. Leland S. Singletary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth K. Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Clyde A. Bowens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a
  • State of Louisiana v. Kendrick Jerrod Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a
  • State v. Prejean 50 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Smith 49 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no mean
  • State v. JVF 47 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Roch Michael Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. H. A., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. J. v. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. B. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin T. Arndt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Clifford Gail Holloway, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State v. J.V.F. 47 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. HA, SR. 47 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Holloway 47 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Thomas 48 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court held that in order to decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature
  • State v. Bordelon 48 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Rocky Bourg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State v. Bourg 42 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua Daniel Sibley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Louis Vernon Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Bianca Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.
  • State v. Sibley 41 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Turner 38 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court noted: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative p