Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 845 So. 2d 1061.

721 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), this court held that in order to decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the
State of Louisiana v. B. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), this court held that in order to decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the
State of Louisiana v. Kevin T. Arndt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Clifford Gail Holloway, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. J.V.F. 47 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. HA, SR. 47 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State v. Holloway 47 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Bordelon 48 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State v. Thomas 48 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court held that in order to decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the
State of Louisiana v. Rocky Bourg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Bourg 42 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Daniel Sibley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Louis Vernon Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Bianca Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), this court noted: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the p
State v. Sibley 41 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State v. Turner 38 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court noted: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment and a comparison of the sen
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningf
State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Kivin Nixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningf
State v. Quinn 38 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appell
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy Joe Chandler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: 1 We note that as part of the plea agreement, the parties agreed that the s
State of Louisiana v. Anthony J. Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Arlene Reed Salameh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Keyowaski M. Doucet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99- 2019, 99-2094 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Allen Maze La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningf
State of Louisiana v. Charles Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Moses Buchanan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Andrae Rashun Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99- 2019, 99-2094 (La.
State v. Maze 36 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appell
State v. Doucet 36 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99-2019, 99-2094 (La.7/6/00), ).
State v. Salameh 38 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State v. Allen 36 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99-2019, 99-2094 (La.7/6/00), ).
State v. Buchanan 36 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State v. Chandler 36 So. 3d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or *1089 makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: Ifiln deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals
State of Louisiana v. Edward N. Wide La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), this court addressed the analysis used when deciding whether a sentence shocks our sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, explaining: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the le
State v. WIDE 35 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court addressed the analysis used when deciding whether a sentence shocks our sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, explaining: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purp
State v. Santos 40 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 1/14/03) , , writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Toby James Fruge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Gene Hollier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 1/14/03), writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Chrishon M. Archield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Eric Blue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningf
State of Louisiana v. Daniel James Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Blue 34 So. 3d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appell
State v. Fruge 34 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 1/14/03), , writ denied, 03-482 (La.5/30/03), , cert.
State v. ARCHIELD 34 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State v. Hollier 37 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 5 Cir. 1/14/03), , writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), , cert.
State v. Broussard 34 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Todd Vincent Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Christopher S. Goodwill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Goodwill 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Milton Anthony Wilks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010