Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 845 So. 2d 1061.

721 citing documents.

State v. Jacobs 74 So. 3d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Bivens 74 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99-2019, 99-2094 (La.7/6/00), ).
State of Louisiana v. Harrison Thibeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningf
State v. Thibeaux 70 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appell
State of Louisiana v. Ricardo K. Dukes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Dukes 66 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Courtney Paul Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99- 2019, 99-2094 (La.
State of Louisiana v. J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-0562 (La.5/30/03)
State v. J.S. 63 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-0562 (La.5/30/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Jason D. Clayton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Edward Charles Morris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Clayton 64 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State v. Morris 63 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), ).
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningf
State of Louisiana v. Jarman Gerard Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/30/03), (citation omitted).
State v. Thomas 63 So. 3d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appell
State v. Jones 63 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Courville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Felton Hurst, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99- 2019, 99-2094 (La.
State v. Hurst 62 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99-2019, 99-2094 (La.7/6/00), ).
State of Louisiana v. Denna L. Decuir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Sherrel King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/30/03), this court held that in order to 2 decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [T]he nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the
State v. King 61 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court held that in order to [3decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [T]he nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment and a *812 com
State v. Decuir 61 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Derrick Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. George Jameson Gray, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Davis 58 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , urrit denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), ).
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Anthony Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , unit denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Jay Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. A.B.M., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Douglas Cody Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Douglas C. Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Henry D. Gilmore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99-2019, 99-2094 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Douglas L. Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. A.B.M. 52 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Clark 52 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
State v. Gilmore 54 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citing State v. Smith, 99-606, 99-2015, 99-2019, 99-2094 (La.7/6/00), ), this court provided a list of factors that may be considered when determining whether a sentence was excessive: “the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment!,] and a *
State of Louisiana v. Leland S. Singletary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningf
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth K. Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Clyde A. Bowens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningf
State of Louisiana v. Kendrick Jerrod Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningf
State v. Prejean 50 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Smith 49 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appell
State v. JVF 47 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Roch Michael Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), this court held that in order to decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of t
State of Louisiana v. H. A., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. J. v. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/30/03), (citations omitted).