Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 845 So. 2d 1061.

721 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Alphonso Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Victor D. Guillory A/K/A Victory Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Tyler John Clause La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana v. Kyle Dewayne Forrester La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (LaApp.
State of Louisiana v. Dewey Glenn Burnworth, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: 7 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the par
State of Louisiana v. Cassetti Dewayne Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: 14 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lynn Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State
State of Louisiana v. Eddie Ray Jackson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. D'Mycal Lmontay Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (L
State of Louisiana v. Detonio M. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), we further explained: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the
State of Louisiana v. J' Vonte Melik Sterling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana v. Solomon Burke Guillory, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (LaApp.
State of Louisiana v. Lonnie B. Kirklin, Jr. A/K/A Lonnie Bernard Kirklin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (L
State of Louisiana v. Kelby Meaux A/K/A Kelby D. Meaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Ezikel Ruben, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” Stat
State of Louisiana v. Ezikel Ruben, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” Stat
State of Louisiana v. Jameel D. Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Curtis Roy Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste, 594 So2d 1 (LaApp.
State of Louisiana v. Brady Louis Vice, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Terry Len Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (
State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. B
State of Louisiana v. Lance S. Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), State v. Soileau, 13-770, pp. 4-5 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Blain K. Bass La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana v. Douglas Wayne Ponthieux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that 31 sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Michael Vaccaro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
Explained State of Louisiana v. Tarik D. Njoku La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), : In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment
State of Louisiana v. Willie R. Sanders, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Harrison L. Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03–562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Michael L. Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Curtis Cheley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana Versus Bobby R. Johnson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Frin Wayne Coward La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Isame Henry Faciane A/K/A Isame Faciance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-0562 (La.5/30/03)
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Cody James Toucheck -Aka- Cody Toucheck La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Babineaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Jason Wright La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Jesse E. Ducote A/K/A Jesse Ducote La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Richard Douglas Westbrook La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committe
State of Louisiana v. Darrel Brown Mathieu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Seth Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and
State of Louisiana v. Randy Keith Baldridge, II -Aka- Randy Baldridge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Sam Clark, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: 3 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (LaApp.
State of Louisiana v. Stephen Allen Lukens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State
State of Louisiana v. Edwin Paul Frinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State v. Frinks 274 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, "it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed."
State v. Ellender 274 So. 3d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, "it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed."
State v. Washington 274 So. 3d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, "it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed."