Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 884 So. 2d 568.

80 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Eddie Matthews, III La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
10/19/04), superseded by statute on other grounds, Butler v. Cain, 327 Fed.Appx.
State of Louisiana v. Laterrian Lewis La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
10/19/04), and State v. Landfair, 10-1693 (La.
Tanya Hurel v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Company D/B/A National Indemnity Group Insurance Companies and Their Insured, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Courtland E. King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
10/19/04), (emphasis added), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Butler v. Cain, 327 Fed.Appx.
State Of Louisiana v. William B. Turner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
10/ 19/ 04), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in State v. LeBlanc, 2014- 0163 ( La.
Timothy M. Gemelli v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Succession Of Rosalie Handy Lewis And John Charles Lewis La. 2022
10/19/04), Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins.
Reginald Martin v. Rodney Thomas, Greer Logging, Llc and National Liability And Fire Insurance Company La. 2022
Sylvia Hawthorne v. Norfolk Southern Corporation D/B/A Norfolk Southern Railway; Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans; Boh … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), Theriot, 694 So.2d at 186.
State Of Louisiana v. Demario G. Warren La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
10/ 19/ 04), the Louisiana Supreme Court overruled its earlier decision in State ex rel.
State of Louisiana Versus Anthony O. Stokes La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
10/19/04); holding that multiple convictions obtained on the same date based on unrelated conduct can be counted separately for sentence enhancement purposes.
Smith v. St. Charles Parish Pub. Sch. 246 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
10/19/04), , 576 ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance , 95-2895 (La.
Succession of William Dalton Pelt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
In re Pelt 244 So. 3d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Shirlene Britt v. Riceland Petroleum Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), Theriot, 694 So.2d at 186.
Britt v. Riceland Petroleum Co. 240 So. 3d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/19/04), , 575 ; Theriot , 694 So.2d at 186 .
State v. Logue 216 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
10/19/04), ; State v. Tucker, 49,950 (La.App.
Radcliffe 10, L.L.C. v. Ronald G. Burger and Lynda O. Burger 219 So. 3d 296 La. 2017
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2007–2371, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), citing State v. Johnson, 2003–2993, p. 12 (La.10/19/04)
State v. Breedlove 213 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Brooks 210 So. 3d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
10/19/04), ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.
State v. Jago 209 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
10/19/04), ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.
Robert D. MAYEUX and Lisa M. Mayeux v. George J. CHARLET, Jr., Deceased, Charlet Funeral Home, Inc., Rev. … 203 So. 3d 1030 La. 2016
Succession of Younger 206 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
10/19/04), ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins.
State v. Broyard 183 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Johnson, 2003-2993, p. 11 (La.10/19/04), .
State v. Tucker 170 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Johnson, 2003-2993, p. 11 (La.10/19/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Carl J. Webb, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
10/19/04), (emphasis added), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Butler v. Cain, 327 Fed.Appx.
State v. Webb 149 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The error complained of by Defendant is a violation of the requirement that “for sentence enhancement purposes, the subsequent felony [(the felony being enhanced)] must be committed after the predicate conviction or convictions.” State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 18 (La.10/19/04), (emphasis added), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Butler v. Cain, 327 Fed.Appx.
State v. Hagans 151 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
10/19/04), , but made clear that the new rule (multiple convictions on the same day could be considered) should not be applied retroactively to convictions entered prior to the Johnson decision.
In re Edward Wisner Donation 150 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 12 (La.10/19/04), ; Theriot , 95-2895, p. 3, 694 So.2d at 186 .
State in the Interest of K. L. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
10/19/04), Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins.
State ex rel. K.L.A. 140 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
[State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 11 (La.10/19/04), ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins.
State v. Heine 140 So. 3d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
15:529.1 requires “for sentence enhancement purposes, the subsequent felony must be committed after the predicate conviction or convictions.” Id., 28 So.3d at 1152 (quoting State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), ).
State v. Blueford 137 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), .
State v. Wilkins 131 So. 3d 839 La. 2014
The legislature is, however, “presumed to have enacted a statute in light of preceding statutes involving the same subject matter and decisions construing such statutes, and, where the new statute is worded differently from the preceding statute, the Legislature is presumed to have intended to change the law.” State v. Johnson, 03-2993, pp. 14-15 (La.10/19/04), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
State v. Davis 121 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), .
Soileau v. Smith True Value & Rental 144 So. 3d 771 La. 2013
10/19/04), -77 ; and State v. Campbell, 2003-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
Sparnecht v. Amar Oil Co. 93 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), .
State v. Maldonado 96 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), .
State v. Breaux 96 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), .
Smith v. State 84 So. 3d 487 La. 2012
Cf. State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), (discussing the habitual offender law set forth in La.Rev.Stat.
Overruled State v. Landfair 70 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
This interpretation was overruled by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), .
State v. Patton 68 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), -79 .
Succession of Faget v. Faget 53 So. 3d 414 La. 2010
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2007-2371, p. 13 *420 (La.7/1/08), , citing State v. Johnson, 2003-2993, p. 12 (La.10/19/04), .
State v. Brooks 48 So. 3d 219 La. 2010
State v. Johnson, 2003-2998, p. 11 (La.10/19/04), .
State v. Law 46 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Watts 41 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
10/19/04), ] 884 So.2d at 575 ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), ; (La.
State v. Sopczak 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
10/19/04), -579 , held that under the habitual offender statute, multiple convictions obtained on the same date but based on unrelated conduct can be counted separately for sentence enhancement, thereby overruling State ex rel.
State v. London 28 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
In State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 18 (La.10/19/04), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that from its inception, LSA-R.S.
Foti v. Holliday 27 So. 3d 813 La. 2009
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), , citing State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 12 (La.10/19/04), .
State v. Cass 17 So. 3d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Regarding double-counting of “predicate convictions” obtained on the same day, which is not the case here, the court in State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), , held that under the habitual offender statute, multiple convictions obtained on the same date but based on unrelated conduct can be counted separately for sentence enhancement, thereby overruling State ex rel.