Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 907 So. 2d 1.

222 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jose E. Moreno La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. Keatre Monique Daniels La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Kristina Nichole Hoffpauir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. April Butler La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
4/12/05), and then citing State v. Barnes, 2011-1421, p. 11 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Tyson Cornelison La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Ernest M. Richardson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Joel G. Lehmann La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Richard Lee Gilbert La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana in the Interest of K.M. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Johnathan Trayvon Kelly La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Harrison J. Bethley La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
4/12/05), (citing Wheat v. United States, 486 U.S. 153, 159, 108 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas Gee La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Berry Parker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Marcel N. Dugar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Felton Thompson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Rotrick Deon Ivory La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana in the Interest of D.F.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Dolan McGinnis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.R.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State v. Warner 274 So. 3d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Williams 262 So. 3d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. George E. Byrd AKA George Byrd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/12/05), , 18 ), set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of the evidence as follows: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
4/12/05), , 18 ), set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of the evidence as follows: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Robertson 239 So. 3d 268 La. 2018
State v. McBride 239 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Cretian 238 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/12/05), , 18 ), set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of the evidence as follows: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Hawkins 219 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Gary 220 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Two Canal Street Investors, Inc. v. New Orleans Building Corp. 212 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/12/05), ; State v. Leger, 2005-0011, p. 43 (La.
State v. Green 211 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
4/12/05), decision clarified on rehearing, 03-0897 (La.
State v. Young 203 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4/12/05), , the standard is as follows: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Rose 206 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State ex rel. T.B. 200 So. 3d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
4/12/05), (couple kidnapped from their home, both shot and then found burned in their torched vehicle); State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.
State v. Falgout 198 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979): the court must determine whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, “was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” see also State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 18 (La.4/12/05), ; State v. Veal, 2012-0712, p. 17 (La.App.
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Further,, the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Hickman 194 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisi *1166 ana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Everette 192 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See also State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. McCorvey 187 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
As a general rule, an indigent defendant “ ‘has a right to counsel as well as the opposite .right to represent himself, [but] he has no constitutional right to be both represented and representative.’” Mathieu , 2010-2421, p. 6, 68 So.3d at 1019 (quoting State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 29 (La.4/12/05), ; ).
State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“Ultimately, all evidence, both direct and circumstantial must be sufficient under Jackson to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to a rational jury.” State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), ; State v. Armstead, 11-1344 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Kyle D. Hodde AKA - Kyle Daniel Hodde La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , the standard for determining an insufficiency of evidence claim is as follows: InWhen reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard , enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Campbell 171 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
As the Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , the standard is as follows: |sWhen reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Pollard 165 So. 3d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 7/5/12), (quoting State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), ).
State v. Simonson 163 So. 3d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 7/5/12), (quoting State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), ).
State v. Rapp 161 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“Ultimately, all evidence, both direct and circumstantial must be sufficient under Jackson to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to a rational jury.” Id., quoting State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Bowens 156 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Canales 156 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
14:10(1) as “that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.” Specific intent may be “inferred from the defendant’s actions and the circumstances of the transaction.” State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), ; see also State v. Barnes, 11-1421, p. 11 (La.App.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by