Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Spears, 929 So. 2d 1219.

55 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Alfred C. Simmons La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
4/4/06), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. James Jefferson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
4/4/06), (citations omitted).
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06)
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06)
State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
4/4/06); State v. Gant, 06-232 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Katron v. Richard A/K/A Katron Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
In State v. Spears, 05–964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), –23, the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Katron 265 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4/4/06), , 1222-23, the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Blackwell 263 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. George E. Byrd AKA George Byrd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
4/4/06), -23, the supreme court stated that: [C]onstitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Kelly 239 So. 3d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Cox 239 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Michael Kees La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
4/4/06), -23, the supreme court stated that: [C]onstitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt
State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
In State v. Spears, 05-964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), -23, the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/4/06), , 1222-23, the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Aaron Dangerfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/16/14), this court outlined the proper means of considering insufficient evidence claims: In State v. Spears, 05-964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), -23, the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a 15
State v. Dangerfield 214 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/4/06), -23 , the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a | ^reasonable doubt.
State v. Chambers 212 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Jerome Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
05-0964 (La.4/4/06), ().
State v. Kyles 233 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4/4/06), ; State v. Gant, 06-232 (La.App.
State v. Ball 209 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Allen 174 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Spears, 05-0964 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Henry 147 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Although we consider the record as a whole, this court cannot be “called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” | ^ see also State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), (constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; the factfinder is given much discretion in determinations of
State of Louisiana v. Jon Dickerson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
We have previously outlined the proper means of considering insufficient evidence claims: In State v. Spears, 05-964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), -23, the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable
State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4/4/06), ), the court stated: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S.
State v. Dickerson 140 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
We have previously outlined the proper means of considering insufficient evidence claims: In State v. Spears, 05-964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), -23 , the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
State ex rel. T.H. 140 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 3 Cir. 11/6/13), (quoting State v. Spears, 05-964, p. 2 (La.4/4/06), ), the court stated: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Henry 138 So. 3d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Spears, 05-0964 (La.4/4/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Wardell Christopher Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4/4/06), -23, the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4/4/06), : 2 When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
State v. Mitchell 125 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The supreme court explained an appellate court’s function in reviewing sufficiency of the evidence claims in State v. Spears, 05-964, p. 2 (La.4/4/06), , 1222: [aWhen reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 124 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Spears, 05-964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), -23 , the supreme court stated that: constitutional law does not require the reviewing court to determine whether it believes the witnesses or whether it believes that the evidence establishes guilt *1240 beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Brooks 124 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 4 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Holmes 119 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Spears, 05-0964 (La.4/4/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Anthony St. Romain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. St. Romain 157 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Spears, 05-964 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Schmolke 108 So. 3d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 4, (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Bone 107 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 9/26/06), , writ denied, 06-2529 (La.5/4/07), and State v. Spears, 05-0964 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Massey 91 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
App. 5 Cir. 9/26/06), , writ denied, 06-2529 (La.5/4/07), ; State v. Spears, 05-0964 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Williams 80 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06)
State v. Cunningham 77 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Spears, 2005-0964 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Honore 31 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Spears, 05-0964 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Jones 28 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06)
State v. Favors 28 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), , 1222
State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), , 1222
State v. Mosley 13 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Spears, 05-0964, p. 3 (La.4/4/06), , 1222
State v. Mitchell 7 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Spears, 05-0964 (La.4/4/06), .
State Ex Rel. Gb 985 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Spears, 05-964 (La.4/4/06), .
State ex rel. G.B. 985 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Spears, 05-964 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Delagardelle 957 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Spears, 05-964 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Browning 956 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Spears, 05-964 (La.4/4/06), .