Cited by

7/1/08), amended on reh'g (9/19/08).

7/1/08), -38 (amended on rehearing).

7/1/08), (internal citations omitted).

7/1/08), (citations omitted), we note the following: The function of statutory interpretation and the construction given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.

7/1/08), The starting point in the interpretation of any statute is the language of the statute itself.

7/ 1/ 08), amended on reh' g ( La.

7/1/08), –27, amended on reh’g (9/19/08), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: “The starting point in the interpretation of any statute is the language of the statute itself.” Therefore, “[w]hen a law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, 5 the law shall be applied as writt

Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), ); see also La.

7/1/08), (citations omitted).

7/1/08), (“When a party acquires a right, either to sue for a cause of action or to defend himself against one, that right becomes a vested property right and is protected by … due process guarantees.”) (emphasis added).11 Lousteau, 2022 WL 2065539, at *12.

7/1/08), (“Generally, when a trial court judgment is silent as to a claim or demand, it is presumed the relief sought was denied.”).

7/ 1108), - 27, our supreme court explained: The function of statutory interpretation and the construction given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.

7/ 1108), - 27, our supreme court explained: The function of statutory interpretation and the construction given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.

7/1/08), City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Assessors’ Retirement and Relief Fund, 05-2548, p. 11 (La.

711108), amended on rehearing on _other grounds ( Sept.

7/1/08), : The starting point in the interpretation of any statute is the language of the statute itself.

7/1/08), ( citing State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 12 (La.

7/1/08), -27 (internal citations omitted): The function of statutory interpretation and the construction given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.

Farms, we upheld the constitutionality of Act 312 and acknowledged “it changed the remedy available.” The plaintiffs in M.J.

7/1/08), -27 (citations omitted): The function of statutory interpretation and the construction given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.