Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Roy, 395 So. 2d 664.

83 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Casey Michael Hatch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
10/17/94); State v. Claibon, supra
State of Louisiana v. Taveon Malik Leary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3088, 61 L.Ed.2d 865 (1979)
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Teasley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Renee Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
The defendant must rebut the presumption of sanity ―at the time of the offense by a preponderance of the evidence.‖ Id.
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Aaron Dangerfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
10/17/94); State v. Claibon, supra
State v. Dangerfield 214 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1981); State v. Claibon, supra
State of Louisiana v. John W. Hatfield, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
-64 (La.1981); -69 (La.1981).
State v. Holder 181 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State ex rel. M.J. 160 So. 3d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Cheatwood, 458 So.2d at 910 ; see also
State of Louisiana v. Joel T. Bailey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-64 (La.1981); -69 (La.1981).
State v. Bailey 92 So. 3d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
*608 663-64 (La.1981); -69 (La.1981).
State v. Wyatt 83 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Peters, 94-0283 (La.10/17/94); State v. Claibon, supra
State of Louisiana v. Cederic D. Sereal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
10/17/94); State v. Claibon, []
State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
3088 , 61 L.Ed.2d 865 (1979)
State v. TRUVIA 29 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Peters, 94-0283 (La.10/17/94); ; State v. Claibon, supra
State v. Williams 22 So. 3d 867 La. 2009
-64 (La.1981); -69 (La.1981).
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Joseph Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
10/17/94); State v. Claibon, [395 S.2d 770 (La.1981)]
State v. Coleman 976 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Peters, 94-0283 (La.10/17/94); ; State v. Claibon, [395 S.2d 770 (La.1981)]
State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
State v. Currie 812 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Peters, 94-0283 (La.10/17/94); ; State v. Claibon, supra
State v. Morgan 779 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Peters, 94-0283 (La.10/17/94); ; State v. Claibon, supra
State v. Reese 774 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Perez 745 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Peters, 94-0283 (La.10/17/94); ; State v. Claibon, supra
State v. Powdrill 684 So. 2d 350 La. 1996
State v. Wilson 679 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Horne 679 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Silman, supra ; State v. Peters, supra ; State v. Claibon, supra ; State v. Foster, 26,143 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/9/94), , writ denied, 95-0548 (La.
State v. Armstrong 671 So. 2d 307 La. 1996
State v. Silman 663 So. 2d 27 La. 1995
1981); State v. Claibon, supra
State v. Sepulvado 655 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Armstrong 649 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
and Jackson v. Virginia, supra .
State v. Peters 643 So. 2d 1222 La. 1994
State v. Corley 617 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Jenkins 600 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Widenhouse 582 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Butler 563 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Brown 557 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Jackson 548 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Lozard 542 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Pier 530 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Gibson 529 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
3088 , 61 L.Ed.2d 865 (1979)
State v. Brantley 514 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Hilburn 512 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Huckaby 495 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Phillips v. Roy 494 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
NOTES [1] in which Roy's conviction of first degree murder was reversed upon a holding that he had proven his insanity defense.
State v. Mire 492 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
ndard of review when such a defendant pleads insanity and claims that there is insufficient evidence to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt is whether any rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could conclude that the defendant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he was insane at the time of the offense
State v. Bowman 491 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Lombard 486 So. 2d 106 La. 1986
3088 , 61 L.Ed.2d 865 (1979)
State v. Jackson 482 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Bell 471 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
The Louisiana Supreme Court applied the Jackson v. Virginia, supra
State v. Sanders 463 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); ” In his remaining arguments defendant contends that the trial judge erred in denying the motion to suppress the confessions and the evidence on several grounds.