Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Chism, 436 So. 2d 464.

249 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Gerald Manchip White La. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Tyler N. Derochowski La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
State Of Louisiana v. Travis Haxford Orso La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Carlos Anthony Toby La. 2024
Circumstantial evidence is “evidence of one fact, or a set of facts, from which the existence of the fact to be determined may reasonably be inferred.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Deon Ray Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
–69 (La.1983) (footnote omitted), the court stated: In criminal cases, the rule as to circumstantial evidence is: assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.
State of Louisiana v. Demetric Cornell Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State v. Toups, 01–1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
State of Louisiana v. David Anthony Burns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
the supreme court explained the hypothesis of innocence: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas Gee La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Marshall J. Alexander, Jr. La. 2023
Circumstantial evidence is “evidence of one fact, or a set of facts, from which the existence of the fact to be determined may reasonably be inferred.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Watson and Stephen Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
our supreme court stated, “The gist of circumstantial evidence, and the key to it, is the inference, or process of reasoning by which the conclusion is reached.
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Lisa W. Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Leo Dorsey La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Court has cautioned that “[a]lthough the circumstantial evidence rule may not establish a stricter standard of review than the more general reasonable juror’s reasonable doubt formula, it emphasizes the need for careful observance of the usual standard, and provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evaluation of circumstantial evidence.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Manuel Dukes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Toups, 2001- 8 1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
State of Louisiana v. Donasty Anwanique Cohen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Cohen 272 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Chism , , 469 (La.1983).
State of Louisiana v. Katron v. Richard A/K/A Katron Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State v. Katron 265 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In State v. Chism , , 469 (La.1983) (citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
In re State in Interest of J.S. 268 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Alexander -Aka- Kevin J. Alexander -Aka- James K. Alexander -Aka- Kevin Alexander, … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
State of Louisiana v. George E. Byrd AKA George Byrd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
though the circumstantial evidence rule may not establish a stricter standard of review than the more general reasonable juror’s reasonable doubt formula, it emphasizes the need for careful observance of the usual standard, and provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evaluation of circumstantial evidence” (La.
State v. Alexander 256 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/15/02), , 912 ; State v. Chism , , 470 (La.1983).
State of Louisiana v. Tanya Buteaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Buteaux 241 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Chism , , 469 (La.1983).
State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In State v. Chism , , 469 (La.1983) (citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee 223 So. 3d 1136 La. 2017
State v. Chambers 212 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Tedrick Jewan Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
State v. Richardson 210 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Jerome Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
05-0964 (La.4/4/06), ().
State v. Ball 209 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Jon Wray Baumberger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Baumberger 200 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Adam Batiste, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State v. Batiste 189 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
(citations omitted), the.
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State of Louisiana v. Eric Abshire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: 3 Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed
State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to- the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 In conclusion, the evidence presented at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the State as required by Jackson, failed to prove that Defendant had the requisite intent to kidnap the victim.4 As Louisiana law does not entertain the notion of “guilt by association,” Defendant‟s convi
State v. McGhee 179 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. David Caleb Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a
State v. Fontenot 160 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State of Louisiana v. James Craig Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: 2 When the issue of sufficiency of the evidence is raised, the inquiry of the court is whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any ra
State v. Johnson 155 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: 13Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Caleb A. Baxley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Baxley 139 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Wardell Christopher Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.