Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mussall, 523 So. 2d 1305.
- State of Louisiana v. Quinton Damone Hill La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
-
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Strong
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.R.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
-
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Peterson
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 9/12/12), ( (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
-
State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
- State Of Louisiana v. Benjamin Bailey La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana Versus Henry Ford, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
-
State of Louisiana v. Desmyne Joseph Henry
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jerome Cochran A/K/A Michael Jerome Cochran, Jr. A/K/A Michael Cochran
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
-
State of Louisiana v. Randy Keith Baldridge, II -Aka- Randy Baldridge
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.” 12
-
State of Louisiana v. David Javon Arceneaux AKA David Arceneaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
- State of Louisiana v. Manuel Dukes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
- State Of Louisiana v. Terrence Michael Southall La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- State Of Louisiana v. Steven Staggs La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
State Of Louisiana v. Roslyn G Legaux
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
P. art. 821( B); - 09 ( La.
- State Of Louisiana v. Ronald Douglas Moore Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
State Of Louisiana v. Patrick James Kraemer
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
art. 821( B); State a Mussall, - 09 Q La.
- State Of Louisiana v. James Matthew Cole La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
State Of Louisiana v. Chaddrick Piper
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2d 654, 660; - 09 11 La.
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.P. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Brian Michael Hughes La. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. David Leger La. 2019
-
State of Louisiana v. Demetrice Dontrell Welch
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
-
State of Louisiana v. Antonio Merquis Harris
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
-
State of Louisiana v. Randall Paul Burton
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Our supreme court has stated: 4 However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
-
State v. Harris
274 So. 3d 178
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Weary , 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311 ; Neal , 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658 ; State v. Mussall , , 1311 (La.1988).
-
State v. Burton
274 So. 3d 122
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.1988).
-
State v. Bradley
272 So. 3d 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Donasty Anwanique Cohen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- State v. Cohen 272 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
State v. Quinn
275 So. 3d 360
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Rather, as the Supreme Court explained in State v. Crawford, 218 So.3d at 20 , , 1310 (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Khoi Q. Hoang La. 2019
-
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Wayne Ross
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
-
State v. Williams
265 So. 3d 902
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Katron v. Richard A/K/A Katron Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
State of Louisiana v. Jarrett Andrews
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
-
State of Louisiana v. Ralph Johnson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
-
State of Louisiana v. Ladray Bias, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
-
State of Louisiana v. Charles P. Mayeux, Jr. AKA Charles P. Mayeux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
- State v. Bias 265 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
State v. Johnson
265 So. 3d 1034
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.1988).
-
State v. Katron
265 So. 3d 1058
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Mussall , , 1309 (La.1988).
- State v. Mayeux 265 So. 3d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
State v. Andrews
265 So. 3d 1078
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2781 , 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Mussall
-
State of Louisiana v. Julius Jamal Garnett
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
(generally, one witness’s positive identification is sufficient to support the conviction); State v. Ford, 28,724 (La.App.
-
State v. Garnett
266 So. 3d 330
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See State v. Mussall , , 1311 (La.1988) (generally, one witness's positive identification is sufficient to support the conviction); State v. Ford , 28,724 (La.App.
-
State v. Gabriel
262 So. 3d 345
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.
-
State v. Leonard
262 So. 3d 378
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.
- State v. Parker 259 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018