Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mussall, 523 So. 2d 1305.

1462 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
onality and that ‘irrational decisions to convict will be overturned, rational decisions to convict will be upheld, and the actual fact finder’s discretion will be impinged upon only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.’ ” State v. Davis, 2002-1043 p. 2-3 (La.6/27/03), (emphasis in original).
State Of Louisiana v. Kenny Veal La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
P. art. 821( B); - 09 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Tyler Nicholas Benoit La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
(generally, one witness’s positive identification is sufficient to support the conviction); State v. Ford, 28,724 (La.App.2d Cir.10/30/96), –50, writ denied, 99–0210 (La.5/14/99)
State of Louisiana v. Trevor A. Matthews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Ezra J. Coutee, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State in the Interest of H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Michael J. Worley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State of Louisiana v. Marshall J. Alexander, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
at 15, 776 So.2d at 1143 (quoting [State v.] Mussall, [(La.1988)]).
State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.N. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
can virtually never be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.”) (citing, inter alia, [State v.] Mussall [ (1988)]); see also Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983, p. 10 (La.11/29/06), (“If the factual findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, a reviewing court may not reverse even though convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact
State Of Louisiana v. Jerome Mellion La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Jordan Cyprian La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
art. 821( B); - 09 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Johnny Moore, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
P. art. 821( B); - 09 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Troy Jordan La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
A sufficiency of evidence review does not require a court to “‘ask itself whether it believes that the evidence at the trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Trahan A/k/a Elizebeth Trahan La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Elie, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State of Louisiana v. Freddy Lee Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State of Louisiana v. Curtis Roy Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
We may impinge upon the fact finder’s discretion “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.”
State of Louisiana v. Bruce L. Lachney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State of Louisiana v. Victor Luis Avila Ramos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Our supreme court has stated: [A]n appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State of Louisiana v. Dwight Washington La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
On appellate review, the trier of fact is called upon to make certain factual findings, whose “discretion will be impinged upon only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” Id., 12-2358, p.7, 130 So.3d at 878 ( (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Millennium Health Care Services, L.L.C., d/b/a Millennium PCA Services La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Nevertheless, the Jackson standard does not permit jurors "` to speculate if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt."' ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Dwaine Joseph Woods, Sr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Nevertheless, the Jackson standard does not permit jurors "` to speculate if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt."' ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Korey W Alleman La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319, 99 S. Ct. 2781, 2") 89, 61 L. Ed. 2d 560 ( 1979); ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Walter Perell Fisher, Jr. La. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. James Bourgeois La. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Young La. 2021
In addition, a reviewing court may intrude on the discretion of the fact finder “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” (La.
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
” the court of appeal observed that “Louisiana jurisprudence has recognized that there are instances in which ‘numerous eccentricities, unusual coincidences and lack of corroboration’ make such testimony so unreliable that even a reasonably pro-prosecution rational fact finder must have a reasonable doubt about the identification.” Id., 11-0121 at 7-8, 69 So.3d at 1223 ().
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
” the court of appeal observed that “Louisiana jurisprudence has recognized that there are instances in which ‘numerous eccentricities, unusual coincidences and lack of corroboration’ make such testimony so unreliable that even a reasonably pro-prosecution rational fact finder must have a reasonable doubt about the identification.” Id., 11-0121 at 7-8, 69 So.3d at 1223 ().
State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Tony Johnson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Stephanie Wilson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
P. art. 821( B); - 09 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Lisa W. Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Michael Vaccaro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State Of Louisiana v. David J. Doyle La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Trevonte Lamarque Talbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Kentrell Hickerson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Alfred Jones, Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Jason Matthew Magee La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
art. 821( B); - 1309 ( La.
State of Louisiana Versus Frederick Seymore, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Trahan A/K/A Elizebeth Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Our supreme court has stated: 4 However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State Of Louisiana v. Ricky Armentor La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Orlando Demond Morris Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
State of Louisiana v. Alan J Boner Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. James Bourgeois La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Brian L. Pope La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State Of Louisiana v. William Thomas Jones, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Emmett Garrison, IV AKA "Lil Emmet" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Chad M. Vidrine La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020