Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bourque, 622 So. 2d 198.

257 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
See State v. Cross, 93–1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93– 2729 (La.7/1/97)
State of Louisiana v. Matt Mason, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
A “trial judge’s ruling [on a fact question], based on conclusions of credibility and weight of the testimony, is entitled to great deference and will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is no evidence to support the ruling.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Dewayne Fitzgerald Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. James E. Tate La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
A “trial judge’s ruling [on a fact question], based on conclusions of credibility and weight of the testimony, is entitled to great deference and will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is no evidence to support the ruling.”
State of Louisiana v. Curtis White, Jr. A/K/A Curtis Ray White, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
at 2081; n. 20 (La.1993)(citing Sullivan).
State of Louisiana v. Delands Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Kendarius Dewayne Sewell A/K/A Kendarius Sewell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
at 2081; n. 20 (La.1993)(citing Sullivan).
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
Likewise, the court has held that “[t]here is no provision in our law which prohibits or requires the sequestration of prospective jurors for individual voir dire.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brynton Kelli Simmons La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Terrence Ty'rell Carvin La. 2021
La. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Michael Joseph Mayeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Guidry 274 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Bourque , , 222 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Charles Middleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Jermaine D. Guidry A/K/A Jermaine Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
/d. A “trial judge’s ruling [on a fact question], based on conclusions of credibility and weight of the testimony, is entitled to great deference and will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is no evidence to support the ruling.”
State v. Middleton 275 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See State v. Bourque , , 216-17 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Edwin Paul Frinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
at 2081; n. 20 (La.1993)(citing Sullivan ).
State v. Frinks 274 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
at 2081 ; , 241 n. 20 (La.1993) (citing Sullivan ).
State of Louisiana v. Antonio Merquis Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Harris 274 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
6/30/95), , 686 ; State v. Bourque , , 225 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Miles J. Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Defendant concedes that “[t]he fact that a juror has a relationship with the victim is not itself enough to sustain a challenge for cause.” overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.
State v. Guidry 271 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See State v. Bourque , overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux , 93-2729 (La.
State v. Breaux 269 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
6/30/95), , 686 ; State v. Bourque , , 225 (La.
State of Louisiana v. David Alan Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Walls La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Cross, 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686
State v. Walls 270 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; , 225 (La.1993).
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Cross, 93–1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; , 225 (La.1993).
State v. Julien 229 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
“A ‘trial judge’s ruling [on a fact question], based on conclusions of credibility and weight of the testimony, is entitled to great deference and will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is no evidence to support the ruling.’ ” Id., 08-2262, pp. 4-5, 45 So.3d at 580-81; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
State v. Jackson 193 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-52 ( State v. Glynn, 94-0332 (La.App.
State v. Tucker 170 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Ward, supra; -17 (La.1993); State v. Tuesno, supra.
State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 4/1/99) , , : The defendant did not present any evidence tending to show a personal interest on behalf of the entire district attorney’s office, which would threaten the fair and impartial administration of justice.
State v. Fields 151 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Johnson 151 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Magee 150 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d |1216, cert, denied, 522 U.S. 1150 , 118 S.Ct.
State v. Taylor 143 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Hunt, 09-1589, p. 6 (La.12/1/09)
State of Louisiana v. Harold Lee Julien, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Cross, 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686
State v. Allen 141 So. 3d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Julien 139 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686
State v. Candebat 133 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
A “trial judge’s ruling [on a fact question], based on conclusions of credibility and weight of the testimony, is entitled to great deference and will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is no evidence to support the ruling.”
State v. Lewis 125 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“In Louisiana, a defendant must use one of his peremptory challenges curatively to remove the juror, thus reducing his remaining peremptory challenges, or waive any complaint on appeal.” State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), ; -230 (La.1993)
State of Louisiana v. Debra Sue Schjenken AKA Debra Sue Hewitt AKA Debra Odir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Brady J. Harrington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Kang, 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
State v. Harrington 129 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
State v. McNair 107 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
A “trial judge’s ruling [on a fact question], based on conclusions of credibility and weight of the testimony, is entitled to great deference and will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is no evidence to support the ruling.”
State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1870, 128 L.Ed.2d 491 (1994)
State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1870 , 128 L.Ed.2d 491 [490] (1994)
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
wherein the defendant complained on appeal of a district court ruling denying his challenge for cause of a prospective juror who indicated she would not be able to consider the defense of intoxication as a mitigating factor in the penalty phase of the defendant’s capital trial.