Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cook, 674 So. 2d 957.

1211 citing documents.

  • State v. Arceneaux 111 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Nash 112 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Wilfred Lee Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Edwards 129 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    We are mindful, however, that the trial court “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Willis J. Mouton AKA Willis James Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Albert Vernon Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Mouton 129 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Nina Lambert Newton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Newton 129 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); .
  • State of Louisiana v. Kristyn Paige Hoffpauir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. James Lee Burks, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ernest D'Wayne Derryberry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
  • State v. Womack 109 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Sims 106 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In overturning this court’s decision, the Supreme Court stated, “On sentence review the only pertinent question is ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” McBride, quoting State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 4 (La.5/31/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jimmy L. Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge ―remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.‖ State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96)
  • State of Louisiana v. Frank Allen Fregia, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 La.5/31/96, ), cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Shane Welch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 [p. 3] (La.5/31/96); cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA - Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA- Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Emmanuel Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), cert.
  • State v. Fregia 105 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Barnes 103 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Bartie 104 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each ease.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
  • State v. Terry 108 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tameshia Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Lazaro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky W. Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky W. Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96)
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Runnels La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. John Franklin Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96)
  • State v. Lazaro 125 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 29 (La.5/31/96); cert.
  • State v. Coleman 101 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Runnels 101 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Jones 101 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Collins 101 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
  • State v. Coleman 101 So. 3d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ben James Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96)
  • State v. Thompson 100 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
  • State v. Glover 106 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marqule Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 [p. 3] (La.5/31/96); cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul David Heider La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95- 2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), cert.
  • State v. Craft 99 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 [p. 3] (La.5/31/96); , cert, denied, 519 U.S. 1043 , 117 S.Ct.
  • State v. Heider 101 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Barrett 104 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Jiles 104 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.