Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cook, 674 So. 2d 957.
-
State v. Arceneaux
111 So. 3d 1177
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State v. Nash
112 So. 3d 409
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Wilfred Lee Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
-
State v. Edwards
129 So. 3d 104
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
We are mindful, however, that the trial court “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Willis J. Mouton AKA Willis James Mouton
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Albert Vernon Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
-
State v. Mouton
129 So. 3d 49
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Nina Lambert Newton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
-
State v. Newton
129 So. 3d 25
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); .
-
State of Louisiana v. Kristyn Paige Hoffpauir
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. James Lee Burks, III
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ernest D'Wayne Derryberry
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
-
State v. Womack
109 So. 3d 418
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State v. Sims
106 So. 3d 709
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In overturning this court’s decision, the Supreme Court stated, “On sentence review the only pertinent question is ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” McBride, quoting State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 4 (La.5/31/96), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy L. Bartie
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge ―remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.‖ State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96)
-
State of Louisiana v. Frank Allen Fregia, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 La.5/31/96, ), cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Shane Welch
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 [p. 3] (La.5/31/96); cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA - Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA- Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
State of Louisiana v. Emmanuel Barnes
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), cert.
-
State v. Fregia
105 So. 3d 999
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State v. Barnes
103 So. 3d 1254
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State v. Bartie
104 So. 3d 735
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each ease.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
-
State v. Terry
108 So. 3d 126
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Tameshia Taylor
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Ronald Lazaro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- State of Louisiana v. Ricky W. Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- State of Louisiana v. Ricky W. Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Collins
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96)
- State of Louisiana v. Donald Runnels La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
State of Louisiana v. John Franklin Breaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96)
-
State v. Lazaro
125 So. 3d 1134
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Jones
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 29 (La.5/31/96); cert.
-
State v. Coleman
101 So. 3d 580
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State v. Runnels
101 So. 3d 1046
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
-
State v. Rains
101 So. 3d 593
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State v. Jones
101 So. 3d 1083
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
-
State v. Collins
101 So. 3d 557
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
-
State v. Coleman
101 So. 3d 612
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ben James Thompson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96)
-
State v. Thompson
100 So. 3d 375
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Additionally, it is within the purview of the trial court to particularize the sentence because the trial judge “remains in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case.” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
-
State v. Glover
106 So. 3d 129
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Marqule Craft
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 [p. 3] (La.5/31/96); cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Paul David Heider
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95- 2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), cert.
-
State v. Craft
99 So. 3d 1108
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 [p. 3] (La.5/31/96); , cert, denied, 519 U.S. 1043 , 117 S.Ct.
-
State v. Heider
101 So. 3d 1025
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
-
State v. Barrett
104 So. 3d 21
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
-
State v. Jiles
104 So. 3d 27
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.