Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. White, 921 So. 2d 1144.

53 citing documents.

Amos Joseph Crader, Jr. v. Alison Faye Crader La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Margaret C. Camalo v. Patricia Laura Estrada Courtois La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Dean J. Guidry, Sr. v. St. Martin Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 2/1/06), this court wrote: 2 In reviewing this case, we have discovered that the judgment is sufficiently unclear so as to render this matter improperly before us on review.
Hidden Grove, LLC v. Richard Brauns and Leslie Brauns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Nakayla Brasseaux v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Erick J. Daigle v. Ebone' Vitatoe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
McKinley Taylor v. Cajun Constructors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Taylor v. Cajun Constructors, Inc. 246 So. 3d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 2/1/06), , 1146 (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Brittany M. Boquet v. Nicole L. Boquet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Boquet v. Boquet 241 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Vera Bernard v. Ace Property & Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Patricia Powell v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Powell v. Rapides Parish Sch. Bd. 238 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/1/06) , , 1146.
Dionisio Gonzalez v. Carey Leshawn Jimmerson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Gonzalez v. Jimmerson 258 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Simple Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas Property, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Landry v. Usie 229 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Succession of Theodule Noel v. Catherine Noel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Debra Bergeron Duhon v. Petro E", LLC " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Duhon v. Petro "E" LLC 226 So. 3d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Melody Smith v. Marcus Sam La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/1/06), : “A final appealable judgment must contain decretal language, and it must name the party in favor of whom the ruling is ordered, the party against whom the ruling is ordered, and the relief that is granted or denied.” While the judgment at issue states that it grants the summary judgment filed on beha
Ronald Lee Stutes, Et Ux. v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Stutes v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. 215 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Melvin Guidry v. Louisiana Scrap Metal Recycling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Guidry v. Louisiana Scrap Metal Recycling 209 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Kelly Mount v. Chrysler, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Robert Caillier v. Strictly Star Touring La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Caillier v. Strictly Stars Touring 195 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Kathryn Elizabeth Holland v. Paul Scott Holland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 2/1/06), : “A final appealable judgment must contain decretal language, and it must name the party in favor of whom the ruling is ordered, the party against whom the ruling is ordered, and the relief that is granted or denied.” While the judgment at issue states that it grants the exception, it is indefinite in
Holland v. Holland 188 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir.2/1/06), , 1146: “A final appealable judgment must contain decretal language, and it must name the party in favor of whom the ruling is ordered, the party against whom the ruling is ordered, and the relief that is granted or denied.” While the judgment at issue states that it grants the exception, it is indefinite in that it s
Melvin L. Maxwell v. Escott Builders, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
William R. Richard v. James P. Hesterly, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Isaiah Loucious v. Crest Industries, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Loucious v. Crest Industries, LLC 166 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Erica Carline Smith v. Stephen M. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (citations omitted) (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Smith v. Smith 176 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (citations omitted) (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Danny Castille, Et Ux. v. Jonathan Blum La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Paula Fortenberry v. Continental Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Cleveland Poncho v. Tanner Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
John Ford Dietz v. Anne Bennett Morrison Dietz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Dietz v. Dietz 128 So. 3d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Laney Ray Barlow, Jr. v. Sandra Guillot Barlow La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
In Re: Michael Dwayne Harris, Et Ux Applying for Private Adoption of J. T. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Barlow v. Barlow 161 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Bayou Estates Development, Inc. v. Clarence Burton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (quoting Jenkins v. Recovery Tech.
Carol Thomas v. Lafayette Parish School System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Thomas v. Lafayette Parish School System 128 So. 3d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Ronald Brooks v. Dr. John Scott Sibille La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/1/06), (where the appellate court dismissed the appeal and remanded the case for the judgment’s reformation and any necessary clarification of the appellate record).
Brooks v. Sibille 107 So. 3d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/1/06) , (where the appellate court dismissed the appeal and remanded the case for the judgment’s reformation and *829 any necessary clarification of the appellate record).
Michael P. Tyler v. Joseph Dejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/1/06), -47, states: In reviewing this case, we have discovered that the judgment is sufficiently unclear so as to render this matter improperly before us on review.