DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gray v. Gray, 65 So. 3d 1247.

30 citing documents.

  • Gregory Ovide Versus Erica Rivers La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • John Pickney Morgan v. Feliciana Lopez Morgan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    711111), In Gray, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that La.
  • Robert Bridges v. Katherine Laurel Bridges La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
  • Susana F. Moody v. Ross Moody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    7/1/11), the supreme court found that the mother’s rehabilitation from drug use was not a “change in circumstances which materially affects the child’s well-being so as to warrant a change of custody” and does not meet “the threshold of Bergeron to warrant the trial court’s modification of a considered custody decre
  • Faye Harvey & Nelford Harvey v. Laramie D. Harper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    This applies not only in actions setting custody initially, but also in actions to change custody.” Mulkey v. Mulkey, 12–2709, pp. 9–10 (La.5/7/13), (citing Gray v. Gray, 11–548, p. 19 (La.7/1/11), which cited La.
  • Irrael Garcia Versus Jaidy Hernandez La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    7/1/11), -59; Evans v. Lungrin, 97- 0541 (La.
  • Nicholas Miller v. Teal Dicherry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • State v. Titus 274 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • Explained Lowe v. Lowe 264 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    7/1/11), , 1260 : We do not discern in this permissive language any intention on the part of the legislature to abrogate the well-accepted Bergeron standard for modification of a considered custody decree even in the context of a relocation, nor has any party directed us to legislative history that would support such a finding
  • E. R. v. T. S. 256 So. 3d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Maxwell Perry Moore v. Aimee Paul Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    7/1/11), : “In determining the child’s best interest, the court shall consider the benefits which the child will derive either directly or indirectly from an enhancement in the relocating parent’s general quality of life.” La.Rev.Stat.
  • Phillip Vidrine v. Danielle Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    7/1/11), (noting that a trial court’s determination “in child custody matters is entitled to great weight, and its discretion will not be disturbed on review in the absence of a clear showing of abuse.”).
  • Vidrine v. Vidrine 245 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    7/1/11), , 1259 (noting that a trial court's determination "in child custody matters is entitled to great weight, and its discretion will not be disturbed on review in the absence of a clear showing of abuse.").
  • England v. England 238 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Carol J. Aymond, Jr. v. Valentina Aymond La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • Aymond v. Aymond 238 So. 3d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Blake v. Morris 222 So. 3d 1277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • Singleton v. Singleton 224 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • Boesch v. Boesch 210 So. 3d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Jaligam v. Pochampally 206 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Toups v. Kauffman 204 So. 3d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Tracie F. v. Francisco D. 188 So. 3d 231 La. 2016
    7/1/11), which cited La.
  • Lawrence v. Lawrence 147 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Gray v. Gray, 2011548 (La.7/1/11), .
  • Danny R Odell v. Billie Kellerhuis Odell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    7/1/11), citing Bergeron
  • Odell v. Odell 139 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Gray v. Gray, 11-548 (La.7/1/11), , citing Bergeron, .
  • McCaffery v. McCaffery 140 So. 3d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Gray v. Gray, 2011-548, p. 19 (La.7/1/11), .
  • Ramsey v. Morales 131 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    was particularly instructive to this Court, even if not dispositive of the specific contested matters at bar.
  • Schneider v. Schneider 115 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Gray v. Gray, 11-548, pp. 19-20 (La.7/1/11), -59 .
  • Pamela Manuel v. Larry Rhinehart Bieber La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    7/1/11), -59, explaining: When a party seeks to change custody rendered in a considered decree, the proponent of change not only must show that a change of circumstances materially affecting the welfare of the child has occurred since the prior order respecting custody, but he or she also “b
  • Mulkey v. Mulkey 108 So. 3d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 11/17/10), , aff'd, 2011-548 (La.7/1/11), .