Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite GREATER NEW ORLEANS EXPRESSWAY v. Olivier, 860 So. 2d 22.
- Coastal Bridge Company, L.L.C. v. Devon Overall and Coastal Contractors Inc La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2026
- Sue Perry, Et Ux Versus Employers Insurance of Wausau La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
-
Byron E. Talbot Contractor, Inc. v. Plaquemines Port, Harbor and Terminal District and J. Caldarera & Company, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
-
Elizabeth LeBlanc Schroeder v. Alan Conrad Schroeder
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
11/ 18/ 03), (" Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.").
-
Evangeline Shrine Club Holding Corporation Through Its Proper and Duly Auth Officers and Directors William Powell, Thomas Kussman …
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Co., 2007–1335 p. 25 (La.4/18/08), Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 2002–2795 p. 3 (La.11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
- Succession of Lawrence J. Randazzo . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
-
Scott A. Niemeyer and Freebooter Productions, LLC v. the Board of Directors of the Paragon Lofts Condominium Association, …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
11/18/03), (observing that “[a]ppeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment” and citing La.
-
Maxine Thomas v. Housing Louisiana Now, L.L.C., Tracy F. Robinson, Master Builders & Contractors, L.L.C., Richard J. Mithun, …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
- Erroll G. Williams, Assessor of Orleans Parish v. Louisiana Tax Commision and Val C. Cupit La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
- State Of Louisiana v. William Wayne Lee, Jr. La. 2023
- Cynthia Percle v. Lafourche Parish Government La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
-
Angela R. Rogers and Edgar L. Rogers v. Caddo Parish School Board, Mary Trammel-President, Dr. T. Lamar Goree-Superintendent, …
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
- Howard C. Schoeffler v. Nancy N. Schoeffler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
-
Bayou Shrimp Processors, Inc. and Bridgefield Employers Insurance Company v. Shelly Delahoussaye
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Co., 2007-1335 p. 25 (La.4/18/08), Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 2002-2795 p. 3 (La.11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
-
1026 Conti Condominiums, LLC v. 1025 Bienville, LLC
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Moreover, “[a]ppeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.” Greater New Orleans Expressway Com’n v. Olivier, 02– 2795, p. 3 (La.11/18/03)
-
City of Abbeville v. Clifford Suire
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Co., 2007–1335 p. 25 10 (La.4/18/08), Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 2002–2795 p. 3 (La.11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
- State of Louisiana v. Valentino Roman Hodge La. 2019
- Johnson v. State Through Department of Transportation and Development 275 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
State in the Interest of R.J., R.T. and R.A.T.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Co., 2007- 1335 p. 25 (La.4/18/08), Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 2002-2795 p. 3 (La.11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
-
State ex rel. R.J.
255 So. 3d 1138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Co. , 2007-1335 p. 25 (La.4/18/08), , 671 ; Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier , 2002-2795 p. 3 (La.11/18/03), , 24 ("Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment."); La.
- Petit v. Ducote 253 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
-
McKinley Taylor v. Cajun Constructors, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
DISCUSSION In Barlow, 161 So.3d at 26-27, this court addressed the exact issue herein: “Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.” Greater New Orleans Expressway Comm’n v. Olivier, 02-2795, p. 3 (La.11/18/03)
- Taylor v. Cajun Constructors, Inc. 246 So. 3d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- In re Barrois 243 So. 3d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
-
Lee Rand v. City of New Orleans
235 So. 3d 1077
La. 2017
art. 2082; see also Greater New Orleans Expressway Com’n v. Olivier, 02-2795, p. 3 (La.11/18/03)
- 429 Bourbon Street, LLC v. RMDR Investments, Inc. 230 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
U.L. Coleman Co. v. Gosslee
244 So. 3d 783
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
11/18/03), ; Hardy v. Easterling , 47,950 (La.
- Hidden Grove, LLC v. Brauns 261 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Neivens v. Estrada-Belli
228 So. 3d 238
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/18/03), , (citations omitted), where the court held, “A judgment and reasons for judgment are two separate and distinct documents.
-
Black Water Marsh, LLC v. Roger C. Ferriss Properties, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Co., 2007–1335 p. 25 (La.4/18/08), Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 2002–2795 p. 3 (La.11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.
- Anderson v. City of New Orleans 222 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Barber v. Louisiana Workforce Commission 221 So. 3d 38 La. 2017
-
Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc.
223 So. 3d 1202
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
11/18/03), ; Hofler v. J.P, Morgan Chase Bank , N.A., 46,047 (La.App.
- Ames v. Ohle 219 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
State ex rel. Department of Children & Family Services, Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Bushman v. Knapp
216 So. 3d 130
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment”); La.
- Cameron Parish Police Jury, Cameron Parish Sheriff and Cameron Parish School Board v. All Taxpayers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Cameron Parish Police Jury v. All Taxpayers 212 So. 3d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Lusich v. Capital One, ACP, LLC
198 So. 3d 1272
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.” Greater New Orleans Expressway Com’n v. Olivier, 2002-2795,- p. 3 (La.11/18/03), .
-
Sutherland v. Alma Plantation, L.L.C.
193 So. 3d 1178
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
New Orleans Expressway Comm’n v. Olivier, 02-2795, p. 3 (La.11/18/03), .
-
Demetrious R. Frazier v. Luke A. Difulco, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
11/18/03), that “[a]ppeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.” And finally, in Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-571, 09-584, 09-585, 09- 586, pp. 77-78 (La.
-
1026 Conti Condominiums, LLC v. 1025 BIENVILLE, LLC
183 So. 3d 724
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Moreover, “[ajppeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.” Greater New Orleans Expressway Com’n v. Olivier, 02-2795, p. 3 (La.11/18/03), .
-
Hardison v. Byrne
182 So. 3d 1110
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 12/23/13), , citing Greater New Orleans Expressway Com'n v. Olivier, 2002-2795, p. 3 (La.11/18/03), .
-
Lohenis v. Rousse
166 So. 3d 1020
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
arts.2082, 2083; Greater New Orleans Expressway Com’n v. Olivier, 02-2795 (La.11/18/03), .
- Kerry Thibodeaux, M.D. (Apmc) v. American Lifecare, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
-
Thibodeaux v. American Lifecare, Inc.
157 So. 3d 1193
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
‘“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.’” Wooley v.' Lucksinger, 09-571, 09-584, 09-585, 09-586, p. 77 (La.4/1/11), (quoting Greater New Orleans Expressway Comm’n v. Olivier, 02-2795, p. 3 *1197 (La.11/18/03), ).
-
Morgan v. Glazers Wholesale Drug Co.
147 So. 3d 295
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
v. Olivier, 02-2795 (La.11/18/03), , and La.
- L.R.F. v. A.A. 133 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
I.F. v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
131 So. 3d 491
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Greater New Orleans Expressway Com’n v. Olivier, 02-2795, p. 3 (La.11/18/03), .
-
Harley-Davison Credit Corp. v. Morris Davis
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
11/18/03), (―Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.‖); La.
-
Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. v. Davis
127 So. 3d 50
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 2007-1335 p. 25 (La.4/18/08), ; Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier, 2002-2795 p. 3 (La.11/18/03), (“Appeals are taken from the judgment, not the written reasons for judgment.”); La.