Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taves, 861 So. 2d 144.
- State of Louisiana v. Ahkeem Jamal Wiggins, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana v. Dontreal D. York La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana v. Joe Butler, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana v. Erik A. Shepherd La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
-
State of Louisiana v. Christopher D. Rodgers
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
12/3/03), State v. Grant, 55,592 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kineric Oneal Curry
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
12/3/03), wherein this court affirmed the defendant’s conviction for false imprisonment while armed with a dangerous weapon after the defendant “pulled a gun on [the victim], threatened to kill her, denied her access to a phone and refused to allow her to leave.” The State additionally cites State v. Disedare, 298 So.3d at
-
State of Louisiana v. Rustin Randall Middleton
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
12/03/03), Brooks, supra.
- State of Louisiana v. Bernard Grant A/K/A Lucius B. Cummings La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Ryan K. Manasco La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Charles Hearnsberger La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. LeDarron Demarion Carter La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana v. Jorge Lopez Benavides La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
-
State of Louisiana v. Sirdetrick Samuels
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
12/3/03), State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.
- State v. Manson 259 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Brooks
256 So. 3d 524
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
12/03/03), ; State v. Garner,supra .
- State v. Washington 245 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Townsend
246 So. 3d 766
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
12/03/03), ; State v. Thompson , 50,392 (La.
- State v. Heins 245 So. 3d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- State v. Lee 243 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
-
State v. Nixon
222 So. 3d 123
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
12/3/03), ; State v. Thompson, 50,392 (La.
-
State v. Lee
216 So. 3d 205
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
12/03/03), ; State v. Thompson, 50,392 (La.
-
State v. Turk
210 So. 3d 402
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
12/03/03), ; State v. Thompson, 50,392 (La.App.
-
State v. Lawson
206 So. 3d 1112
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
12/3/03), ; State v. Thompson, 50,392 (La.App.
-
State v. Washington
188 So. 3d 350
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Thompson
189 So. 3d 1139
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.
-
State v. Miller
189 So. 3d 1160
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Tave s, 2003-0518 (La.12/03/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/02/11), .
-
State v. Love
185 So. 3d 136
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Johnson
178 So. 3d 1140
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir. 11/2/11), .
-
State v. Nealon
179 So. 3d 661
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Osborne
167 So. 3d 1085
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Baker
166 So. 3d 1152
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.
-
State v. Mitchell
163 So. 3d 858
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Hooter
162 So. 3d 532
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.
-
State v. Mack
152 So. 3d 229
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Woods
139 So. 3d 1085
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Bibbins
140 So. 3d 153
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Taves decision was affirmed in part and reversed in part by the Supreme Court in State v. Taves, 02-518 (La.12/3/03), (per curiam).
-
State v. Elkins
138 So. 3d 769
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Linnear, supra.
-
State v. Kohlman
136 So. 3d 909
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Evans
130 So. 3d 965
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Robinson
127 So. 3d 1000
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/03/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/02/11), .
-
State v. Smith
117 So. 3d 1273
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Singleton
117 So. 3d 306
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Linnear, supra.
-
State v. George
117 So. 3d 285
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Smith
114 So. 3d 1229
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Tatum, supra; State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Hamm
114 So. 3d 1180
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Linnear, supra.
-
State v. Humphreys
114 So. 3d 1184
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Tatum, supra, State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Slattery
116 So. 3d 804
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The pertinent question on appellate review is “whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.” see also State v. Taves, 03-0518, p. 4 (La.12/3/03), (per curiam) (collecting cases).
-
State v. Parker
112 So. 3d 366
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the sentence imposed by a trial court was unconstitutionally excessive, the Louisiana Supreme Court has previously held: The pertinent question on appellate review is “whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.” see also State v. Taves, 03-0518, p. 4 (La.12/3/03), (per curiam)(collecting cases).
-
State v. Glover
106 So. 3d 129
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
-
State v. Wilson
99 So. 3d 1067
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The pertinent question on appellate review is “whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.” see also | ¿State v. Taves, 03-0518, p. 4 (La.12/3/03), (per cu-riam) (collecting cases).