DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 845 So. 2d 1061.

721 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Rico Matthews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Console 981 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Leyva-Martinez 981 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court discussed what constituted a sentence that shocked the sense of justice or made no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, and stated: [An] appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the pun
  • State v. Cornwell 982 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. James W. Berry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Randall J. Morain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Gregory T. Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    5/30/03), this court discussed the factors it considers to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court
  • State v. Morain 981 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-0562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Arabie 982 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    5 Cir. 1/14/03) , , writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), , cert.
  • State v. Stevens 978 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Ware 980 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Sampy 978 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-0562 (La.5/30/03), , this court held that in order to decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the
  • State of Louisiana v. Kimberly Sampy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    5/30/03), this court held that in order to decide whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, the following factors may be considered: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Ware La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. D. H. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Joseph Stevens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. DHB 977 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Seay 977 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Sloan 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Tasha Jane Darce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. J.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    5/30/03), (alteration in original).
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Alvernon Sloan, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Alfonso M. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Trent Everett Seay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Carmouche 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. DARCE 977 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. JLC 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    5/30/03), (alteration in original).
  • State v. Senegal 972 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State v. Hicks 977 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Lawrence J. Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Jessie J. Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Suire 966 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Joseph Suire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Farrell J. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Johnny Otis Washington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Eddie W. Northcutt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Northcutt 966 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. LaGarde 970 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    5 Cir. 1/14/03) , , writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Office 967 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Brandon J. Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Craig L. Bailey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acce
  • State of Louisiana v. Thomas J. Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Raymond O'Neal Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. John Reed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence 4 shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or make
  • State of Louisiana v. Matthew W. Schilling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    5/30/03), (citations omitted) we said: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind
  • State of Louisiana v. Harry Coward La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    5/30/03), this court stated that “[i]n deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to 6 acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative
  • State v. Bailey 968 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appell
  • State v. Coward 967 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court stated that “[i]n deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to 17acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment and a comparison