Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of Batiste, 367 So. 2d 784.

108 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.F. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 3/21/12), citing State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of D.W. La. 2023
art. 883; see also State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of K.M. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State in the Interest of Batiste
State in the Interest of H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Article 5, Section 10, Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste, (La.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.N. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Regarding delinquency adjudications, the supreme court explained the hybrid nature of such sufficiency reviews in a per curiam reversing an appellate court’s assessment: Finally, the court of appeal emphasized that juvenile delinquency proceedings are essentially civil in nature, State in the Interest of Batiste, and that review of a delinquency adjudication is therefore subject not only to the due process standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.H.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State in Interest of C.R., 2019-0917, p. 6, 290 So.3d at 224 (quoting State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of S.C.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 3/21/12), citing State in the Interest of Batiste, La.1979); State in the Interest of S.S., (La.
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Finally, the court of appeal emphasized that juvenile delinquency proceedings are essentially civil in nature, State in the Interest of Batiste, and that review of a delinquency adjudication is therefore subject not only to the due process standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State ex rel.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of A.P. Vs. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 3/21/12), citing State in the Interest of Batiste, (1979); State in the Interest of S.S., (La.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.R.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State ex rel. D.S. 255 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/21/12), , 1207 (citing State in the Interest of Batiste , (La.
State ex rel. D.J.S. 255 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Article 5, Section 10, Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste , (La.
State in the Interest of D.J.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Article 5, Section 10, 14 Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste, (La.
State ex rel. W.V. 246 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See also State in the Interest of Batiste
In re State 240 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Article 5, Section 10, Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste , (La.
State in the Interest of C.T. 236 So. 3d 1210 La. 2017
Cf. State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State ex rel. M.B. 217 So. 3d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5, § 10, 18 and 19; State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. J.J. 196 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Article 5, Section 10, Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. C.T. 195 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Article 5, Section 10, Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. D.H. 165 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. M.J. 160 So. 3d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 6/29/11), , 714 (citing State in the Interest of Batiste, ).
State ex rel. J.D. 154 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 3/21/12), , citing State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State ex rel. A.J. 151 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. R.P. 150 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 3/21/12), , citing State in the Interest of Batiste, State ex rel.
State ex rel. T.S. 150 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. X.F. 143 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. S.J. 129 So. 3d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/21/12), , citing State in the Interest of Batiste, State in the Interest of S.S., (La.App.
State ex rel. J.A.J. 128 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State ex rel. J.J. 125 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/21/12), , citing, State in the Interest of Batiste, State ex rel.
State ex rel. O.W. 160 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State in Interest of Q.T., 2012-0433, p. 4 (La.App.
State ex rel. T.M. 105 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
rel Batiste, noted: [jjuvenile delinquency proceedings do not fall within the category of criminal prosecutions, as is evident from long established jurisprudence ..., and the special juvenile provisions within the judiciary article of the constitution.
State ex rel. Q.T. 100 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State ex rel.
State in the Interest of C.D. 93 So. 3d 1272 La. 2012
Finally, the court of appeal emphasized that juvenile delinquency proceedings are essentially civil in nature, State in the Interest of Batiste, and that review of a delinquency adjudication is therefore subject not only to the due process standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State ex rel. D.M. 91 So. 3d 296 La. 2012
The source for the latter approach is this Court’s decision in State in Interest of Batiste, (“Juvenile delinquency proceedings do not fall within the category of criminal prosecutions, as is evident from long established jurisprudence....
State ex rel. T.E. 91 So. 3d 292 La. 2012
Given that “[n]o other evidence was introduced to establish that the object was a handgun, and notably, no handgun was Lever actually recovered from T.E.,” the majority applied a civil standard of review derived from this Court’s decision in State in Interest of Batiste, (“Juvenile delinquency proceedings do not fall within the category of criminal prosecutions, as is evident from long established jurisprudence....
State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State in the Inter *1190 est of Batiste
State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. R.L. 95 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State ex rel.
State ex rel. J.T. 94 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 2/9/11), (citing State in Interest of Batiste, ); State in the Interest of C.D., 11-0121, p. 6 (La.App.
State ex rel. R.H. 89 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State in the Interest of Batiste, State in Interest of D.M., 11-0462 (La.App.
State ex rel. T.M. 88 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. K.G. 88 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State in the Interest of S.S., (La.App.
State in the Interest of D. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Const. Art. V, § 10(B) (1974); State In Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. D.D. 86 So. 3d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Const. Art. V, § 10(B) (1974); State In Interest of Batiste
State in Interest of Te 85 So. 3d 270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 10/13/10), (quoting State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State ex rel. A.H. 80 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State ex rel.
State ex rel. R.V. 82 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Dm 80 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
[3] See State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State ex rel. of D.M. 80 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 See State in the Interest of Batiste