DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 594 So. 2d 1.

544 citing documents.

  • State v. Buchanan 36 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Edward N. Wide La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. WIDE 35 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Chrishon M. Archield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel James Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. ARCHIELD 34 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Broussard 34 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher S. Goodwill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    31 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide 32 some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to 33 the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. 34 Batiste, [, 3] (La.App.
  • State v. Goodwill 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Milton Anthony Wilks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Wilks 32 So. 3d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Crayton Jones, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Zoran Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 29 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 28 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph T. Plauche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Plauche 32 So. 3d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brenda Langlinais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense -3- committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Langlinais 27 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense | committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald T. Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonah Valrie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Valrie 25 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Fontenot 25 So. 3d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled *229 that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Scotty L. Webre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Neal W. Insley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lurlene Leigh Evans La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Dainelle Montgomery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy E. Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Insley 22 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Webre 21 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Sepulvado 18 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Mickey J. Suire, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense 6 committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Bacardny Wayne George La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Zee Morice Sepulvado, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. George 19 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Suire 19 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense |7committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. John 11 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Joseph John La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. James Vincent Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Adams 13 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. LeBlanc 12 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Maryln A. Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Randall J. Morain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Archie Louis Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darryl Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Carter 12 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Morain 11 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Boudreaux 11 So. 3d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. John Stanley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. John Prince La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.